Literature DB >> 12678286

Human scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity: a comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological data.

György Benedek1, Krisztina Benedek, Szabolcs Kéri, Tamás Letoha, Márta Janáky.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate spatiotemporal visual functions under scotopic and photopic conditions in order to acquire human psychophysical and electrophysiological data that are comparable with contrast sensitivities based on single-unit recordings in animal experiments. Static and dynamic contrast sensitivities (CSs) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were measured under photopic and scotopic conditions in healthy volunteers. The results from the CS experiment indicated that the inclusion of temporal modulation and the application of scotopic luminance levels uniformly resulted in a relatively increased sensitivity for low spatial frequencies. Similarly, analysis of the second harmonic component of the VEPs demonstrated a shift from band-pass to low-pass functions. These results suggest that, under scotopic conditions, human visuospatial processing is characteristically predominated by the functional activity of the magnocellular pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678286     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022548013313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  39 in total

1.  Colour, contrast and the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  D A Thompson; N Drasdo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Sensitivity of macaque retinal ganglion cells and human observers to combined luminance and chromatic temporal modulation.

Authors:  J Kremers; B B Lee; P K Kaiser
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Rod inputs to macaque ganglion cells.

Authors:  B B Lee; V C Smith; J Pokorny; J Kremers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances.

Authors:  A van Meeteren; J J Vos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials.

Authors:  Z Kubová; M Kuba; H Spekreijse; C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Contrast sensitivity and orientation selectivity in lamina IV of the striate cortex of Old World monkeys.

Authors:  M J Hawken; A J Parker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Steady state visual evoked potentials in the alert primate.

Authors:  K Nakayama; M Mackeben
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Impaired visual search in dyslexia relates to the role of the magnocellular pathway in attention.

Authors:  T R Vidyasagar; K Pammer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-26       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  A whole-field scotopic retinal sensitivity test for the detection of early glaucoma damage.

Authors:  Y Glovinsky; H A Quigley; B Drum; R A Bissett; H D Jampel
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; M Best; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  7 in total

1.  Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness.

Authors:  Zuzana Kubová; Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Jana Chlubnová; Jaromir Sverák
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults.

Authors:  Cynthia L Clark; Joseph L Hardy; Vicki J Volbrecht; John S Werner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Mesopic foveal contrast sensitivity is impaired in diabetic patients without retinopathy.

Authors:  Gabriel Katz; Hani Levkovitch-Verbin; Giora Treister; Michael Belkin; Jacob Ilany; Uri Polat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision.

Authors:  Nadine Hollbach; Christoph Tappeiner; Anna Jazwinska; Volker Enzmann; Markus Tschopp
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04

5.  Ganglion cell adaptability: does the coupling of horizontal cells play a role?

Authors:  Karin Dedek; Chethan Pandarinath; Nazia M Alam; Kerstin Wellershaus; Timm Schubert; Klaus Willecke; Glen T Prusky; Reto Weiler; Sheila Nirenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An Event-related Potential Study on the Interaction between Lighting Level and Stimulus Spatial Location.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Elisabeth Ruiz-Padial; María T Mendoza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Scotopic Vision Is Selectively Processed in Thick-Type Columns in Human Extrastriate Cortex.

Authors:  Roger B H Tootell; Shahin Nasr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.