BACKGROUND: Contrast sensitivity (CS) has been studied extensively to determine its effectiveness as a test for diagnosing early and advanced diabetic retinopathy. Various techniques have been adopted to measure CS, and most of them reported a significant difference between diabetic and normal eyes. Our purpose is to demonstrate differences in foveal CS between diabetic patients without retinopathy and healthy subjects under mesopic and photopic conditions, using a simple, rapid computerized test. METHODS: Seventeen eyes of nine patients with type 2 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy were included. Fourteen eyes of seven non-diabetic patients served as controls. All the patients underwent a careful ophthalmologic examination, including ETDRS chart visual acuity, color photographs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients with any ocular disease were excluded. All eyes had a visual acuity of 20/25 or better, a normal eye examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was tested using a computerized psychophysical static method involving four forced-choice procedures. The targets were Gabor patches with spatial frequencies of 3-12 cycles per degree (cpd). The mesopic testing was conducted in a completely darkened room; the monitor was covered with a neutral density filter, allowing luminance of only 0.9 cd/m(2). RESULTS: The average age was similar: 59.1 ± 5.3 years in the diabetic group vs 61.4 ± 3.2 years in the control group. The average duration of diabetes was 16 years (range 6-26). The average visual acuity was 0.04 ± 0.01 logMAR and 0.01 ± 0.01 logMAR in the diabetic and control groups respectively. Photopic foveal CS was similar in both groups. Significantly lower CS was found in diabetic patients under mesopic conditions at a spatial frequency of 3 (p < 0.008). At higher spatial frequencies, the mesopic contrast sensitivity was very low in both groups and without a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Mesopic foveal CS is impaired in diabetic patients despite good visual acuity, a normal fundus examination and normal OCT. Early central visual function impairment may occur in diabetic patients before the appearance of retinopathy.
BACKGROUND: Contrast sensitivity (CS) has been studied extensively to determine its effectiveness as a test for diagnosing early and advanced diabetic retinopathy. Various techniques have been adopted to measure CS, and most of them reported a significant difference between diabetic and normal eyes. Our purpose is to demonstrate differences in foveal CS between diabeticpatients without retinopathy and healthy subjects under mesopic and photopic conditions, using a simple, rapid computerized test. METHODS: Seventeen eyes of nine patients with type 2 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy were included. Fourteen eyes of seven non-diabeticpatients served as controls. All the patients underwent a careful ophthalmologic examination, including ETDRS chart visual acuity, color photographs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients with any ocular disease were excluded. All eyes had a visual acuity of 20/25 or better, a normal eye examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was tested using a computerized psychophysical static method involving four forced-choice procedures. The targets were Gabor patches with spatial frequencies of 3-12 cycles per degree (cpd). The mesopic testing was conducted in a completely darkened room; the monitor was covered with a neutral density filter, allowing luminance of only 0.9 cd/m(2). RESULTS: The average age was similar: 59.1 ± 5.3 years in the diabetic group vs 61.4 ± 3.2 years in the control group. The average duration of diabetes was 16 years (range 6-26). The average visual acuity was 0.04 ± 0.01 logMAR and 0.01 ± 0.01 logMAR in the diabetic and control groups respectively. Photopic foveal CS was similar in both groups. Significantly lower CS was found in diabeticpatients under mesopic conditions at a spatial frequency of 3 (p < 0.008). At higher spatial frequencies, the mesopic contrast sensitivity was very low in both groups and without a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Mesopic foveal CS is impaired in diabeticpatients despite good visual acuity, a normal fundus examination and normal OCT. Early central visual function impairment may occur in diabeticpatients before the appearance of retinopathy.
Authors: A A Dosso; E R Bonvin; Y Morel; A Golay; J P Assal; P M Leuenberger Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jan Krasny; Michal Andel; Renata Brunnerova; Ilona Cihelkova; Zdenēk Dominek; Jan Lebl; Konstantinos Papadopoulos; Petr Soucek; Ludmila Treslova Journal: Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov Date: 2007-11
Authors: O Brinchmann-Hansen; H J Bangstad; S Hultgren; R Fletcher; K Dahl-Jørgensen; K F Hanssen; L Sandvik Journal: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) Date: 1993-04
Authors: Nazlee Zebardast; Bonnielin K Swenor; Suzanne W van Landingham; Robert W Massof; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila K West; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ravid Doron; Anna Sterkin; Moshe Fried; Oren Yehezkel; Maria Lev; Michael Belkin; Mordechai Rosner; Arieh S Solomon; Yossi Mandel; Uri Polat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katherine A Joltikov; Vinicius M de Castro; Jose R Davila; Rohit Anand; Sami M Khan; Neil Farbman; Gregory R Jackson; Chris A Johnson; Thomas W Gardner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Moon K Kim; Moe H Aung; Lukas Mees; Darin E Olson; Nikita Pozdeyev; P Michael Iuvone; Peter M Thule; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.799