OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of participating in undergraduate teaching in general practice for patients with common mental disorders. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey and qualitative in-depth interviews. SETTING: Community based undergraduate teaching programme for fourth year students at a London medical school doing a psychiatry attachment. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaire survey: all patients involved in the teaching programme over one academic year. In-depth interviews: 20 patients, 14 students, and 12 general practitioner tutors participating in the programme. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed high levels of satisfaction with teaching encounters for participating patients, which were corroborated in the interviews. Many patients and general practitioners reported specific therapeutic benefits for patients from contact with students, including raised self esteem and empowerment; the development of a coherent "illness narrative"; new insights into their problems; and a deeper, more balanced, and understanding doctor-patient relationship. For a few patients the teaching caused some distress, which may relate to a lack of insight into their condition or deficits in students' interviewing skills. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in teaching can have additional positive therapeutic outcomes for selected patients with common mental disorders, although a small minority report negative effects. Testing in a larger sample is needed to determine the characteristics of patients in these two subgroups and establish whether these effects persist.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of participating in undergraduate teaching in general practice for patients with common mental disorders. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey and qualitative in-depth interviews. SETTING: Community based undergraduate teaching programme for fourth year students at a London medical school doing a psychiatry attachment. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaire survey: all patients involved in the teaching programme over one academic year. In-depth interviews: 20 patients, 14 students, and 12 general practitioner tutors participating in the programme. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed high levels of satisfaction with teaching encounters for participating patients, which were corroborated in the interviews. Many patients and general practitioners reported specific therapeutic benefits for patients from contact with students, including raised self esteem and empowerment; the development of a coherent "illness narrative"; new insights into their problems; and a deeper, more balanced, and understanding doctor-patient relationship. For a few patients the teaching caused some distress, which may relate to a lack of insight into their condition or deficits in students' interviewing skills. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in teaching can have additional positive therapeutic outcomes for selected patients with common mental disorders, although a small minority report negative effects. Testing in a larger sample is needed to determine the characteristics of patients in these two subgroups and establish whether these effects persist.
Authors: Sjim Romme; Matthijs H Bosveld; Marloes A Van Bokhoven; Jascha De Nooijer; Hélène Van den Besselaar; Jerôme J J Van Dongen Journal: Health Expect Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 3.377