BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic and racial-ethnic disparities in health status across the United States are large and persistent. Obesity rates are rising faster in black and Hispanic populations than in white populations, and they foreshadow even greater disparities in chronic illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease in years to come. Factors that influence dietary intake of fruit and vegetables in these populations are only partly understood. OBJECTIVES: We examined associations between fruit and vegetable intake and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), analyzed whether neighborhood SES explains racial differences in intake, and explored the extent to which neighborhood SES has differential effects by race-ethnicity of US adults. DESIGN: Using geocoded residential addresses from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we merged individual-level data with county and census tract-level US Census data. We estimated 3-level hierarchical models predicting fruit and vegetable intake with individual characteristics and an index of neighborhood SES as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Neighborhood SES was positively associated with fruit and vegetable intake: a 1-SD increase in the neighborhood SES index was associated with consumption of nearly 2 additional servings of fruit and vegetables per week. Neighborhood SES explained some of the black-white disparity in fruit and vegetable intake and was differentially associated with fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans. CONCLUSIONS: The positive association of neighborhood SES with fruit and vegetable intake is one important pathway through which the social environment of neighborhoods affects population health and nutrition for whites, blacks, and Hispanics in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic and racial-ethnic disparities in health status across the United States are large and persistent. Obesity rates are rising faster in black and Hispanic populations than in white populations, and they foreshadow even greater disparities in chronic illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease in years to come. Factors that influence dietary intake of fruit and vegetables in these populations are only partly understood. OBJECTIVES: We examined associations between fruit and vegetable intake and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), analyzed whether neighborhood SES explains racial differences in intake, and explored the extent to which neighborhood SES has differential effects by race-ethnicity of US adults. DESIGN: Using geocoded residential addresses from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we merged individual-level data with county and census tract-level US Census data. We estimated 3-level hierarchical models predicting fruit and vegetable intake with individual characteristics and an index of neighborhood SES as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Neighborhood SES was positively associated with fruit and vegetable intake: a 1-SD increase in the neighborhood SES index was associated with consumption of nearly 2 additional servings of fruit and vegetables per week. Neighborhood SES explained some of the black-white disparity in fruit and vegetable intake and was differentially associated with fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans. CONCLUSIONS: The positive association of neighborhood SES with fruit and vegetable intake is one important pathway through which the social environment of neighborhoods affects population health and nutrition for whites, blacks, and Hispanics in the United States.
Authors: K J Joshipura; F B Hu; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; E B Rimm; F E Speizer; G Colditz; A Ascherio; B Rosner; D Spiegelman; W C Willett Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-06-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shari S Kronsberg; Eva Obarzanek; Sandra G Affenito; Patricia B Crawford; Zak I Sabry; Marcia Schmidt; Ruth Striegel-Moore; Sue Y S Kimm; Bruce A Barton Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2003-07
Authors: Shamarina Shohaimi; Ailsa Welch; Sheila Bingham; Robert Luben; Nicholas Day; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Meir J Stampfer; JoAnn E Manson; Kathryn M Rexrode; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Dolores Acevedo-Garcia; Theresa L Osypuk; Nancy McArdle; David R Williams Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sarah Stark Casagrande; Manuel Franco; Joel Gittelsohn; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans; Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski; Tiffany L Gary-Webb Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Jeremy N Miles; Margaret M Weden; Diana Lavery; José J Escarce; Kathleen A Cagney; Regina A Shih Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Vidya S Farook; Lavanya Reddivari; Srinivas Mummidi; Sobha Puppala; Rector Arya; Juan Carlos Lopez-Alvarenga; Sharon P Fowler; Geetha Chittoor; Roy G Resendez; Birunda Mohan Kumar; Anthony G Comuzzie; Joanne E Curran; Donna M Lehman; Christopher P Jenkinson; Jane L Lynch; Ralph A DeFronzo; John Blangero; Daniel E Hale; Ravindranath Duggirala; Jairam Kp Vanamala Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Darby Jack; Kathryn Neckerman; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; Gina S Lovasi; James Quinn; Catherine Richards; Michael Bader; Christopher Weiss; Kevin Konty; Peter Arno; Deborah Viola; Bonnie Kerker; Andrew Rundle Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.022