Literature DB >> 12675565

Production of phytase by Mucor racemosus in solid-state fermentation.

Barbara Bogar1, George Szakacs, Ashok Pandey, Sabu Abdulhameed, James C Linden, Robert P Tengerdy.   

Abstract

Phytase production was studied by three Mucor and eight Rhizopus strains by solid-state fermentation (SSF) on three commonly used natural feed ingredients (canola meal, coconut oil cake, wheat bran). Mucor racemosus NRRL 1994 (ATCC 46129) gave the highest yield (14.5 IU/g dry matter phytase activity) on coconut oil cake. Optimizing the supplementation of coconut oil cake with glucose, casein and (NH(4))(2)SO(4), phytase production in solid-state fermentation was increased to 26 IU/g dry matter (DM). Optimization was carried out by Plackett-Burman and central composite experimental designs. Using the optimized medium phytase, alpha-amylase and lipase production of Mucor racemosus NRRL 1994 was compared in solid-state fermentation and in shake flask (SF) fermentation. SSF yielded higher phytase activity than did SF based on mass of initial substrate. Because this particular isolate is a food-grade fungus that has been used for sufu fermentation in China, the whole SSF material (crude enzyme, in situ enzyme) may be used directly in animal feed rations with enhanced cost efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675565     DOI: 10.1021/bp020126v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  10 in total

1.  High level phytase production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 563 in solid state culture: response surface optimization, up-scaling, and its partial characterization.

Authors:  K Bhavsar; V Ravi Kumar; J M Khire
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Analysis of microbiomes in three traditional starters and volatile components of the Chinese rice wines.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Lixia Ren; Dongna Li; Xia Ma
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Production and characterization of a novel, thermotolerant fungal phytase from agro-industrial byproducts for cattle feed.

Authors:  Neha Kumari; Saurabh Bansal
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Optimization of phytase production by solid substrate fermentation.

Authors:  B Bogar; G Szakacs; J C Linden; A Pandey; R P Tengerdy
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Optimization of phytase production by Penicillium purpurogenum GE1 under solid state fermentation by using Box-Behnken design.

Authors:  Ghada E A Awad; Mohamed M I Helal; Enas N Danial; Mona A Esawy
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Isolation, characterization and optimization of culture parameters for production of an alkaline protease isolated from Aspergillus tamarii.

Authors:  Dayanandan Anandan; William N Marmer; Robert L Dudley
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.258

7.  Improvement of Phytase Activity by a New Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain Using Statistical Optimization.

Authors:  Edi Franciele Ries; Gabriela Alves Macedo
Journal:  Enzyme Res       Date:  2011-08-09

8.  Bioprocessing of Agricultural Residues as Substrates and Optimal Conditions for Phytase Production of Chestnut Mushroom, Pholiota adiposa, in Solid State Fermentation.

Authors:  Kritsana Jatuwong; Jaturong Kumla; Nakarin Suwannarach; Kenji Matsui; Saisamorn Lumyong
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21

Review 9.  Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: A review and bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Levi Yafetto
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-03-24

10.  Phytate degradation by fungi and bacteria that inhabit sawdust and coffee residue composts.

Authors:  Mohamed Fathallh Eida; Toshinori Nagaoka; Jun Wasaki; Kenji Kouno
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.