Literature DB >> 12674367

Spatial representation in body coordinates: evidence from errors in remembering positions of visual and auditory targets after active eye, head, and body movements.

A Kopinska1, L R Harris.   

Abstract

Eight participants were presented with auditory or visual targets and then indicated the target's remembered positions relative to their head eight seconds after actively moving their eyes, head or body to pull apart head, retinal, body, and external space reference frames. Remembered target position was indicated by repositioning sounds or lights. Localization errors were found related to head-on-body position but not of eye-in-head or body-in-space for both auditory (0.023 dB/deg in the direction of head displacement) and visual targets (0.068 deg/deg in the direction opposite to head displacement). The results indicate that both auditory and visual localization use head-on-body information, suggesting a common coding into body coordinates--the only conversion that requires this information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12674367     DOI: 10.1037/h0087410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  14 in total

1.  Influence of static eye and head position on tone-evoked gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Touch used to guide action is partially coded in a visual reference frame.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

4.  Localization of a remembered target under the influence of different head and body positions.

Authors:  Frank Schmäl; Barbara Glitz; Oliver Thiede; Wolfgang Stoll
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceived touch location is coded using a gaze signal.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dependence of auditory spatial updating on vestibular, proprioceptive, and efference copy signals.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of head roll on perceived auditory zenith.

Authors:  Denise C P B M Van Barneveld; Tom J Van Grootel; Bart Alberts; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Authors:  Sakineh B Akram; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Karen Van Ooteghem; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.