Literature DB >> 12673435

Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system.

C Chaussain-Miller1, F Decup, S Domejean-Orliaguet, D Gillet, M Guigand, R Kaleka, O Laboux, J Lafont, E Medioni, R Serfaty, F Toumelin-Chemla, J Tubiana, J J Lasfargues.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to assess the efficiency and benefit of a chemomechanical system for carious dentin removal, Carisolv, in general practice. A revised caries classification, the site/stage concept, was used to describe the clinical situations of all carious lesions treated. The study was performed by 12 investigators, and 120 carious lesions were treated with Carisolv. Sixty percent of the cases were treated without anaesthesia, and we found a significant correlation between chemomechanical treatment without anaesthesia and absence of pain ( P=0.01). In 78.3% of the cases, carious dentin was totally removed with Carisolv, and in 21.7%, the dentin treatment was completed by drilling. In cases performed with Carisolv alone, the time required to remove carious dentin was 11.1+/-9.51 min (mean+/-SD). Treatment time was equivalent for all sites and increased significantly with each successive stage of lesion progression ( P<0.001). In 82.5% of cases, the clinicians were satisfied with Carisolv, and in 99.2%, so were the patients. We conclude that, using clinical examination methods, Carisolv seems to remove carious dentin at all sites and stages of carious lesions but must be made more efficient for use in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12673435     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-003-0196-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  21 in total

1.  Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin.

Authors:  Y Hosoya; Y Kawashita; G W Marshall; G Goto
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques.

Authors:  A Banerjee; T F Watson; E A Kidd
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 3: Pulpal inflammation and its sequelae.

Authors:  K J Heyeraas; O B Sveen; I A Mjör
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Effect of Carisolv solution on sound, demineralized and denatured dentin--an ultrastructural investigation.

Authors:  M Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A comparative in vitro study of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries removal.

Authors:  S G Schutzbank; J Galaini; J H Kronman; M Goldman; R E Clark
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review.

Authors:  H K Yip; L P Samaranayake
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Chemochemical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments.

Authors:  J A Beeley; H K Yip; A G Stevenson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients.

Authors:  G M Maragakis; P Hahn; E Hellwig
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion?

Authors:  R Haak; M J Wicht; M J Noack
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  In-vitro study to compare the efficacy of N-monochloro-D,L-2-aminobutyrate (NMAB, GK-101E) and water in caries removal.

Authors:  O Barwart; I Moschen; A Graber; K Pfaller
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.837

View more
  6 in total

1.  Managing caries: the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice.

Authors:  F Schwendicke; S Doméjean; D Ricketts; M Peters
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study.

Authors:  Gaddam Divya; Madhu Ghanashyam Prasad; Aron Arun Kumar Vasa; Done Vasanthi; Boyapati Ramanarayana; Praffulla Mynampati
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-07-01

3.  Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Authors:  Zuhal Kirzioglu; Taskin Gurbuz; Yucel Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viral P Maru; B S Shakuntala; C Nagarathna
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-31

5.  Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Surendar Ramamoorthi; Malli Sureshbabu Nivedhitha; P Pranav Vanajassun
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Chemo-mechanical and Rotary-mechanical Methods in Removal of Caries with Respect to Time Consumption and Pain Perception in Pediatrc Dental Patients.

Authors:  Ashish Katiyar; Sukriti Gupta; Kirtija Gupta; Karuna Sharma; Bhoomika Tripathi; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.