Literature DB >> 11385201

Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients.

G M Maragakis1, P Hahn, E Hellwig.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency and patient acceptance of the chemomechanical caries removal agent Carisolvtrade mark in deciduous teeth. Contralateral primary molars of sixteen 7- to 9-year-old patients (32 teeth) were treated with the air-motor and with Carisolv, respectively. Patients replied to a pre- and a postoperative questionnaire. Complete caries removal (CCR) was accomplished in all air-motor sessions. It was not achieved within the time limit of 15 min in 6 (37.5%) Carisolv sessions. Air-motor CCR time ranged between 6 and 18 s (mean: 11.81 s ). Carisolv CCR time, where accomplished within 15 min, ranged between 6 min 46 s and 13 min 57 s (mean: 6 min 51 s). Preoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the drilling, and that they would visit the dentist more often and prefer sitting in the chair longer if they could avoid it. Postoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the taste of Carisolv, estimated Carisolv to have taken longer, would not recommend it to their friends, and preferred the air-motor. In conclusion, Carisolv, although a step forward in terms of solution volume required, is not in a position to replace rotary instruments for caries removal: it did not remove decay completely in one third of our sample; it was much slower than the air-motor; it had a chlorine taste/odor our patients disliked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11385201     DOI: 10.1159/000047457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  23 in total

1.  A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children.

Authors:  H K Soni; A Sharma; P B Sood
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-13

2.  Fluorescence of primary dentine after chemomechanical and conventional rotary excavation.

Authors:  F N P Corrêa; R O Rocha; F Z M Soares; L E Rodrigues-Filho; C R M Rodrigues
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2008-09

3.  Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system.

Authors:  C Chaussain-Miller; F Decup; S Domejean-Orliaguet; D Gillet; M Guigand; R Kaleka; O Laboux; J Lafont; E Medioni; R Serfaty; F Toumelin-Chemla; J Tubiana; J J Lasfargues
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Authors:  Zuhal Kirzioglu; Taskin Gurbuz; Yucel Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods - a clinical study.

Authors:  Pallvi Goomer; R L Jain; Harsimrat Kaur; Rahul Sood
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-06-23

Review 6.  Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & Study of an Indigen-ously Developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children.

Authors:  Karthik Venkataraghavan; Anil Kush; Cs Lakshminarayana; Latha Diwakar; Puja Ravikumar; Shankargouda Patil; Sandhya Karthik
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-08-28

7.  Recent vs Conventional Methods of Caries Removal: A Comparative in vivo Study in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Swati Chowdhry; Sonali Saha; Firoza Samadi; J N Jaiswal; Aarti Garg; Preet Chowdhry
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-28

8.  Evaluation of the chemomechanical removal of dentine caries in vivo with a new modified Carisolv gel.

Authors:  Solveig Fure; P Lingström
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  The evaluation of the vector system in removal of carious tissue.

Authors:  Mine Yildirim; Figen Seymen; Nurullah Keklikoglu
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-04-29

10.  Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars.

Authors:  Asli Topaloglu-Ak; Ece Eden; Jo E Frencken; Ozant Oncag
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.