Literature DB >> 11037762

Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion?

R Haak1, M J Wicht, M J Noack.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether shear bond strengths (SBS) to chemomechanically excavated dentine (Carisolv) differed from the SBS after conventional caries removal (bur). The following adhesive systems were used: Dyract AP/NRC/Prime & Bond NT; Dyract AP/Prime & Bond NT; Tetric Ceram/ Syntac SC; Tetric Ceram/Syntac SC (no etch) (TC 2); Definite/Etch & Prime 3.0; Definite/experimental. One-hundred and twenty human molars with occlusal caries were assigned to 12 groups. Sequential caries removal was controlled with laser fluorescence. After water storage, the samples were tested in a single-plane shear test assembly. The results demonstrated differences between the bonding systems, whereas the mode of caries removal had no consistent effect. If total etch technique was neglected, the results of the composite resin (TC 2) indicated a tendency to higher SBS in the Carisolv group (18.6 +/- 4.6 MPa) compared with conventional treatment (14.1 +/- 3.9 MPa). The present data demonstrate that chemomechanical caries removal has no adverse effect on bonding of modern adhesive systems to dentine. Smear layer-dissolving or -modifying bonding systems could potentially benefit from chemomechanical pretreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037762     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  7 in total

1.  Fluorescence of primary dentine after chemomechanical and conventional rotary excavation.

Authors:  F N P Corrêa; R O Rocha; F Z M Soares; L E Rodrigues-Filho; C R M Rodrigues
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2008-09

2.  Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system.

Authors:  C Chaussain-Miller; F Decup; S Domejean-Orliaguet; D Gillet; M Guigand; R Kaleka; O Laboux; J Lafont; E Medioni; R Serfaty; F Toumelin-Chemla; J Tubiana; J J Lasfargues
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain).

Authors:  Jyothi Chittem; Girija S Sajjan; Kanumuri Madhu Varma
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

4.  Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  A Shihab Anwar; R Krishna Kumar; V Arun Prasad Rao; N Venugopal Reddy; V J Reshma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

5.  Marginal Micro-leakage of Self-etch and All-in One Adhesives to Primary Teeth, with Mechanical or Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Authors:  Nouzari A; Zohrei A; Ferooz M; Mohammadi N
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2016-06

6.  Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Surendar Ramamoorthi; Malli Sureshbabu Nivedhitha; P Pranav Vanajassun
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09

7.  Effect of a Papain-based Chemomechanical Agent on Structure of Dentin and Bond Strength: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Sruthi Nair; Roopa R Nadig; Veena S Pai; Yashwanth Gowda
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.