Literature DB >> 12671745

Homoeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato.

Y Ji1, R T Chetelat.   

Abstract

We compared meiotic pairing and recombination between tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum) and homoeologous Solanum lycopersicoides chromosomes in monosomic additions (MAs) and substitution lines (SLs), each representing a single chromosome of the nightshade in a tomato background. Three configurations of each alien chromosome and its two tomato homoeologues were detected by genomic in situ hybridization in MA-7, -8, and -10 at diakinesis/metaphase-I: 1 trivalent (III), 1 bivalent + 1 univalent (II+I), and 3 univalents (3I). The II+I category was by far the most common, and the univalent was from S. lycopersicoides 91-99.5% of the time, indicating a high degree of preferential (homologous) pairing. In the corresponding substitution lines, association of homoeologous chromosomes was much higher (up to 90% of the cells), presumably due to the absence of homologous partners. However, SL-10 showed a surprisingly high frequency of univalents (about 73%). Genome-wide analysis of chromosome pairing revealed a decrease in the average chiasma frequency for both monosomic additions and substitution lines. Recombination between tomato and the nightshade was restricted in all cases, the reduction being more severe in each monosomic addition than in the corresponding substitution line. Recombination rates in the substitutions were less than those observed for the same chromosomes in the first backcross generation. Chromosomes 8 and 10 showed the highest and the lowest rates of homoeologous recombination, respectively. No recombination was detected between markers on the long arm of chromosome 10, presumably due to the presence of a paracentric inversion differentiating the two genomes in this region. The frequency of homoeologous pairing at diakinesis/metaphase-I was significantly higher than the rate of homoeologous recombination detected in the progeny, suggesting a strong selection against recombinant products in meiotic or post-meiotic stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12671745     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-1090-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  11 in total

1.  Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of an Oryza officinalis-O. sativa chromosome 4 addition line and its progenies.

Authors:  Huajun Jin; Guangxuan Tan; D S Brar; Ming Tang; Gang Li; Lili Zhu; Guangcun He
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement.

Authors:  Lili Qi; Bernd Friebe; Peng Zhang; Bikram S Gill
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Homeologous recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines of cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Michael A Canady; Yuanfu Ji; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effects of suppressing the DNA mismatch repair system on homeologous recombination in tomato.

Authors:  Sheh May Tam; John B Hays; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Brassica rapa-Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra monosomic addition lines.

Authors:  Robert Hasterok; Elzbieta Wolny; Sylwia Kulak; Aleksandra Zdziechiewicz; Jolanta Maluszynska; Waheeb K Heneen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  hi2-1, a QTL which improves harvest index, earliness and alters metabolite accumulation of processing tomatoes.

Authors:  Amit Gur; Sonia Osorio; Eyal Fridman; Alisdair R Fernie; Dani Zamir
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Transmission and recombination of homeologous Solanum sitiens chromosomes in tomato.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pertuzé; Yuanfu Ji; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Authors:  Paola Gaiero; Magdalena Vaio; Sander A Peters; M Eric Schranz; Hans de Jong; Pablo R Speranza
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Seed colour loci, homoeology and linkage groups of the C genome chromosomes revealed in Brassica rapa-B. oleracea monosomic alien addition lines.

Authors:  Waheeb K Heneen; Mulatu Geleta; Kerstin Brismar; Zhiyong Xiong; J Chris Pires; Robert Hasterok; Andrew I Stoute; Roderick J Scott; Graham J King; Smita Kurup
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades.

Authors:  Yuanfu Ji; Ricardo Pertuzé; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.