Literature DB >> 15068003

Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades.

Yuanfu Ji1, Ricardo Pertuzé, Roger T Chetelat.   

Abstract

We employed genomic in situ hybridization to analyze the chromosomal constitution and pairing of interspecific and intergeneric hybrids involving cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and two related wild nightshade species, Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens. Using standard stringency conditions, the tomato genome was readily distinguished from that of the two nightshades, whereas the latter were only distinguishable under increased stringency. These observations indicate a more distant phylogenetic relationship between L. esculentum and the Solanum group, and suggest S. lycopersicoides and S. sitiens share a high degree of sequence homology. Chromosomal associations during meiosis of interspecific and intergeneric hybrids were consistent with these relationships: chromosomes of F1 L. esculentum x S. lycopersicoides and F1 L. esculentum x S. sitiens hybrids frequently formed univalents during diakinesis. In contrast, F1 S. lycopersicoides x S. sitiens hybrids showed complete bivalent formation. L. esculentum x S. sitiens hybrids, including the F1 plants, a monosomic addition, and an allotetraploid, showed lower frequencies of pairing between homeologous chromosomes than the corresponding L. esculentum x S. lycopersicoides genotypes. A trigenomic 2n + 14 hybrid, with 12 extra chromosomes from S. sitiens and 2 from S. lycopersicoides, displayed mostly homologous chromosome associations. The distribution of rDNA genes appeared similar in the three genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15068003     DOI: 10.1023/b:chro.0000013162.33200.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   4.620


  15 in total

1.  Genomic analysis of diploid plants.

Authors:  G Kimber; Y Yen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High resolution physical mapping of 45S (5.8S, 18S and 25S) rDNA gene loci in the tomato genome using a combination of karyotyping and FISH of pachytene chromosomes.

Authors:  J Xu; E D Earle
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Homoeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato.

Authors:  Y Ji; R T Chetelat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides.

Authors:  C M Rick; J W De Verna; R T Chetelat; M A Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Distribution of 5S and 18S-28S rDNA loci in a tetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and its putative diploid ancestors.

Authors:  R E Hanson; M N Islam-Faridi; E A Percival; C F Crane; Y Ji; T D McKnight; D M Stelly; H J Price
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

Authors:  J D Sherman; S M Stack
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  New 18S.26S ribosomal RNA gene loci: chromosomal landmarks for the evolution of polyploid wheats.

Authors:  J Jiang; B S Gill
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Transmission and recombination of homeologous Solanum sitiens chromosomes in tomato.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pertuzé; Yuanfu Ji; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Comparison of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes among Solanum species and other Solanaceae.

Authors:  N Borisjuk; L Borisjuk; G Petjuch; V Hemleben
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.166

10.  Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pertuzé; Yuanfu Ji; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.166

View more
  7 in total

1.  An interspecific hybrid as a tool to study phylogenetic relationships in plants using the GISH technique.

Authors:  Michaela Markova; Elleni Michu; Boris Vyskot; Bohuslav Janousek; Jitka Zluvova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Homeologous recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines of cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Michael A Canady; Yuanfu Ji; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Behaviour of Sinapis alba chromosomes in a Brassica napus background revealed by genomic in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  Y P Wang; X X Zhao; K Sonntag; P Wehling; R J Snowdon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Integrative mapping of Gossypium hirsutum L. by meiotic fluorescent in situ hybridization of a tandemly repetitive sequence (B77).

Authors:  Yuanfu Ji; Xinping Zhao; Andrew H Paterson; H James Price; David M Stelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of suppressing the DNA mismatch repair system on homeologous recombination in tomato.

Authors:  Sheh May Tam; John B Hays; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Authors:  Paola Gaiero; Magdalena Vaio; Sander A Peters; M Eric Schranz; Hans de Jong; Pablo R Speranza
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  Application of Genomic In Situ Hybridization in Horticultural Science.

Authors:  Fahad Ramzan; Adnan Younis; Ki-Byung Lim
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.