Literature DB >> 21823740

A new material mapping procedure for quantitative computed tomography-based, continuum finite element analyses of the vertebra.

Ginu U Unnikrishnan1, Elise F Morgan.   

Abstract

Inaccuracies in the estimation of material properties and errors in the assignment of these properties into finite element models limit the reliability, accuracy, and precision of quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element analyses of the vertebra. In this work, a new mesh-independent, material mapping procedure was developed to improve the quality of predictions of vertebral mechanical behavior from QCT-based finite element models. In this procedure, an intermediate step, called the material block model, was introduced to determine the distribution of material properties based on bone mineral density, and these properties were then mapped onto the finite element mesh. A sensitivity study was first conducted on a calibration phantom to understand the influence of the size of the material blocks on the computed bone mineral density. It was observed that varying the material block size produced only marginal changes in the predictions of mineral density. Finite element (FE) analyses were then conducted on a square column-shaped region of the vertebra and also on the entire vertebra in order to study the effect of material block size on the FE-derived outcomes. The predicted values of stiffness for the column and the vertebra decreased with decreasing block size. When these results were compared to those of a mesh convergence analysis, it was found that the influence of element size on vertebral stiffness was less than that of the material block size. This mapping procedure allows the material properties in a finite element study to be determined based on the block size required for an accurate representation of the material field, while the size of the finite elements can be selected independently and based on the required numerical accuracy of the finite element solution. The mesh-independent, material mapping procedure developed in this study could be particularly helpful in improving the accuracy of finite element analyses of vertebroplasty and spine metastases, as these analyses typically require mesh refinement at the interfaces between distinct materials. Moreover, the mapping procedure is not specific to the vertebra and could thus be applied to many other anatomic sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823740      PMCID: PMC3379558          DOI: 10.1115/1.4004190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  33 in total

1.  Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions.

Authors:  Alison C Jones; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Alison C Jones; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Development of specimen-specific finite element models of human vertebrae for the analysis of vertebroplasty.

Authors:  V N Wijayathunga; A C Jones; R J Oakland; N R Furtado; R M Hall; R K Wilcox
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models.

Authors:  G Chen; B Schmutz; D Epari; K Rathnayaka; S Ibrahim; M A Schuetz; M J Pearcy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.

Authors:  Masahiko Bessho; Isao Ohnishi; Juntaro Matsuyama; Takuya Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Imai; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A finite element analysis of a T12 vertebra in two consecutive examinations to evaluate the progress of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Provatidis; C Vossou; E Petropoulou; A Balanika; G Lyritis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.

Authors:  Majid Mirzaei; Ahad Zeinali; Arash Razmjoo; Majid Nazemi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical evaluation by patient-specific finite element analyses demonstrates therapeutic effects for osteoporotic vertebrae.

Authors:  Daisuke Tawara; Jiro Sakamoto; Hideki Murakami; Norio Kawahara; Juhachi Oda; Katsuro Tomita
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-03-20

10.  Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.

Authors:  Zohar Yosibash; Nir Trabelsi; Charles Milgrom
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Glenn D Barest; David B Berry; Amira I Hussein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Ahmad Nassr; Michael J Yaszemski; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Spatial assessment of femoral neck bone density and microstructure in hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joshua D Auger; Amartya J Naik; Akira M Murakami; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 4.  Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Jacob M Reeves; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-12-09

Review 5.  Image-based biomechanical models of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Cina; Matteo Panico; Domenico Albano; Carmelo Messina
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-08-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.