Literature DB >> 12669747

Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting.

Edward Awh1, Michi Matsukura, John T Serences.   

Abstract

Larger benefits of spatial attention are observed when distractor interference is prevalent, supporting the view that spatial selection facilitates visual processing by suppressing distractor interference. The present work shows that cuing effects with identical visual displays can grow substantially as the probability of distractor interference increases. The probability of interference had no impact on spatial cuing effects in the absence of distractors, suggesting that the enlarged cuing effects were not caused by changes in signal enhancement or in the spatial distribution of attention. These findings suggest that attentional control settings determine more than where spatial attention is directed; top-down settings also influence how attention affects visual processing, with increased levels of distractor exclusion when distractor interference is likely.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12669747     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Herbert Hagendorf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-07

3.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; John T Serences; Barry Giesbrecht; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Benoit Brisson; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

6.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-02-01

8.  Enhanced attentional gain as a mechanism for generalized perceptual learning in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding.

Authors:  Kristin Williamson; Miranda Scolari; Sukeun Jeong; Min-Shik Kim; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Learning to attend: effects of practice on information selection.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.