Literature DB >> 12669177

Differential sensitivity to acute administration of Ritalin, apomorphine, SCH 23390, but not raclopride in mice selectively bred for hyperactive wheel-running behavior.

J S Rhodes1, T Garland.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Previous studies of mice ( Mus domesticus) selectively bred for high voluntary wheel running have suggested that the hyperactivity is associated with dysfunction in the dopaminergic neuromodulatory system and that high-running mice may represent a useful genetic model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that mice from the four replicate hyperactive lines would respond differently to methylphenidate (Ritalin), apomorphine (non-selective dopamine agonist), SCH 23390 (selective D1-like dopamine antagonist), and raclopride (selective D2-like dopamine antagonist) than individuals from the four replicate, randomly bred, control lines.
METHODS: After animals were habituated (3 weeks) to their cages with attached wheels, drugs were administered via intraperitoneal injections, at night, during peak wheel-running activity. Revolutions on wheels 10-70 min post-injection were used to quantify drug responses.
RESULTS: Ritalin (15 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg) increased wheel running in control lines but decreased running in selected lines. A low-dose (0.125 mg/kg) of apomorphine reduced wheel running by a similar amount in control and selected lines; however, higher doses of apomorphine (0.25 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg) produced greater reductions in wheel running in the control lines. SCH 23390 (0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg) caused greater reductions in wheel running in control than in selected lines. Raclopride (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg) reduced wheel running by a similar amount in control and selected lines.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the interpretation that genetically determined hyperactive wheel-running behavior is associated with altered dopaminergic function in this mouse model. More specifically, results suggest that D1-like (D1 or D5), but not D2-like (D2, D3, or D4), dopamine receptors have reduced function in the high-running mice. The fact that Ritalin decreased wheel running in selected lines further supports their use as an animal model of ADHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12669177     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1399-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  52 in total

Review 1.  Animal genetic models for complex traits of physical capacity.

Authors:  S L Britton; L G Koch
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 2.  Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Interpreting studies that compare high- and low-selected lines on new characters.

Authors:  N D Henderson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 4.  Heterogeneity of dopamine receptors.

Authors:  K R Jarvie; M G Caron
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Timing, space and ADHD: the dopamine theory revisited.

Authors:  F Levy; J M Swanson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.744

6.  Evolution of a small-muscle polymorphism in lines of house mice selected for high activity levels.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Martin T Morgan; John G Swallow; Justin S Rhodes; Isabelle Girard; Jason G Belter; Patrick A Carter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Role of serotonin in the paradoxical calming effect of psychostimulants on hyperactivity.

Authors:  R R Gainetdinov; W C Wetsel; S R Jones; E D Levin; M Jaber; M G Caron
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Presynaptic dopamine D1 receptors attenuate excitatory and inhibitory limbic inputs to the shell region of the rat nucleus accumbens studied in vitro.

Authors:  C M Pennartz; M J Dolleman-Van der Weel; S T Kitai; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Altered dopaminergic function in the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen of an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder--the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Authors:  V Russell; A de Villiers; T Sagvolden; M Lamm; J Taljaard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-04-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Locomotor bias produced by intra-accumbens injection of dopamine agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  C Messier; O Mrabet; C Destrade
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  38 in total

1.  Strain screen and haplotype association mapping of wheel running in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot; Larry Leamy; Daniel Pomp; Michael J Turner; Anthony A Fodor; Amy Knab; Robert S Bowen; David Ferguson; Trudy Moore-Harrison; Alicia Hamilton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-10

Review 2.  Driven to be inactive? The genetics of physical activity.

Authors:  Trudy Moore-Harrison; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

3.  Current understanding of the genetic basis for physical activity.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Mouse genetic differences in voluntary wheel running, adult hippocampal neurogenesis and learning on the multi-strain-adapted plus water maze.

Authors:  Jennifer R Merritt; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system affects wheel-running activity in differentially active mice.

Authors:  A M Knab; R S Bowen; A T Hamilton; J T Lightfoot
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.711

Review 6.  Animal models to guide clinical drug development in ADHD: lost in translation?

Authors:  Jeffery R Wickens; Brian I Hyland; Gail Tripp
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  A clinically translatable mouse model for chemotherapy-related fatigue.

Authors:  Jonathan A Zombeck; Edward G Fey; Gregory D Lyng; Stephen T Sonis
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Genetic variation for body weight change in mice in response to physical exercise.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Daniel Pomp; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 9.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  The impact of maternal neglect on genetic hyperactivity.

Authors:  Petra Majdak; Elizabeth L Grogan; Joseph V Gogola; Anastassia Sorokina; Stephen Tse; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.