Literature DB >> 22475103

Pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system affects wheel-running activity in differentially active mice.

A M Knab1, R S Bowen, A T Hamilton, J T Lightfoot.   

Abstract

The genetic factors involved in the regulation of physical activity are not well understood. The dopamine system has been implicated in the control of voluntary locomotion and wheel running (WR) in mice and is thus a likely candidate as a genetic/biological system important to the regulation of physical activity. This study evaluated the effects of four different dopaminergic acting drugs on WR in differentially active inbred strains of mice. High active C57L/J (n=7, 3 controls, 4 experimental) and low active C3H/HeJ (n=8, 3 controls, 5 experimental) were analyzed for baseline wheel-running indices of distance (km/day), duration (mins/day), and speed (m/min) for 21 days. Experimental mice received increasing doses over four days of each of the following drugs: SKF 81297 (D1 agonist), SCH 23390 (D1 antagonist), GBR 12783 (DAT inhibitor), and AMPT (tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor). Each drug dose response treatment was separated by three days of recovery (no drug injections). WR indices were monitored during drug treatments and during drug wash-out phases. SKF 81297 significantly reduced (p=0.0004) WR in the C57L/J mice, but did not affect WR in the C3H/HeJ mice. GBR 12783 significantly increased (p=0.0005) WR in C3H/HeJ mice, but did not affect WR in C57L/J mice. Only duration (not overall WR) was significantly reduced in C57L/J mice in response to SCH 23390 (p=0.003) and AMPT (p=0.043). SCH 23390 (p=0.44) and AMPT (p=0.98) did not significantly affect WR in C3H/HeJ mice. These results suggest that genetic differences in dopamine signaling may play a role in the WR response to dopaminergic-acting drugs in inbred strains of mice. The high activity in the C57L/J strain appears most responsive to D1-like receptor acting drugs, while in the C3H/HeJ strain, dopamine re-uptake appears to have an influence on activity level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22475103      PMCID: PMC4190615     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents        ISSN: 0393-974X            Impact factor:   1.711


  33 in total

Review 1.  Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  An epistatic genetic basis for physical activity traits in mice.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Daniel Pomp; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Current understanding of the genetic basis for physical activity.

Authors:  J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Wheel activity in 26 strains of mouse.

Authors:  M F Festing
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 5.  The biological control of voluntary exercise, spontaneous physical activity and daily energy expenditure in relation to obesity: human and rodent perspectives.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Heidi Schutz; Mark A Chappell; Brooke K Keeney; Thomas H Meek; Lynn E Copes; Wendy Acosta; Clemens Drenowatz; Robert C Maciel; Gertjan van Dijk; Catherine M Kotz; Joey C Eisenmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Differential sensitivity to acute administration of cocaine, GBR 12909, and fluoxetine in mice selectively bred for hyperactive wheel-running behavior.

Authors:  J S Rhodes; G R Hosack; I Girard; A E Kelley; G S Mitchell; T Garland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2005 update.

Authors:  Tuomo Rankinen; Molly S Bray; James M Hagberg; Louis Pérusse; Stephen M Roth; Bernd Wolfarth; Claude Bouchard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The role of mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine.

Authors:  L H Gold; N R Swerdlow; G F Koob
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Amphetamine-induced locomotion and gene expression are altered in BDNF heterozygous mice.

Authors:  A J Saylor; J F McGinty
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  Altered dopaminergic profiles: implications for the regulation of voluntary physical activity.

Authors:  Amy M Knab; Robert S Bowen; Alicia T Hamilton; Alyssa A Gulledge; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Wheel running reduces high-fat diet intake, preference and mu-opioid agonist stimulated intake.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Nicholas T Bello; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Phenotypic and molecular differences between rats selectively bred to voluntarily run high vs. low nightly distances.

Authors:  Michael D Roberts; Jacob D Brown; Joseph M Company; Lauren P Oberle; Alexander J Heese; Ryan G Toedebusch; Kevin D Wells; Clayton L Cruthirds; John A Knouse; J Andries Ferreira; Thomas E Childs; Marybeth Brown; Frank W Booth
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Differential skeletal muscle proteome of high- and low-active mice.

Authors:  David P Ferguson; Lawrence J Dangott; Emily E Schmitt; Heather L Vellers; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 4.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

5.  Loss of Cdk5 function in the nucleus accumbens decreases wheel running and may mediate age-related declines in voluntary physical activity.

Authors:  Gregory N Ruegsegger; Ryan G Toedebusch; Thomas E Childs; Kolter B Grigsby; Frank W Booth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Nucleus accumbens neuronal maturation differences in young rats bred for low versus high voluntary running behaviour.

Authors:  Michael D Roberts; Ryan G Toedebusch; Kevin D Wells; Joseph M Company; Jacob D Brown; Clayton L Cruthirds; Alexander J Heese; Conan Zhu; George E Rottinghaus; Thomas E Childs; Frank W Booth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Region-specific deficits in dopamine, but not norepinephrine, signaling in a novel A30P α-synuclein BAC transgenic mouse.

Authors:  Tonya N Taylor; Dawid Potgieter; Sabina Anwar; Steven L Senior; Stephanie Janezic; Sarah Threlfell; Brent Ryan; Laura Parkkinen; Thierry Deltheil; Milena Cioroch; Achilleas Livieratos; Peter L Oliver; Katie A Jennings; Kay E Davies; Olaf Ansorge; David M Bannerman; Stephanie J Cragg; Richard Wade-Martins
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  Differential miRNA expression in inherently high- and low-active inbred mice.

Authors:  Michelle Dawes; Kelli J Kochan; Penny K Riggs; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-07-29

9.  Differential gene expression in high- and low-active inbred mice.

Authors:  Michelle Dawes; Trudy Moore-Harrison; Alicia T Hamilton; Tyrone Ceaser; Kelli J Kochan; Penny K Riggs; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Activity of D1/2 Receptor Expressing Neurons in the Nucleus Accumbens Regulates Running, Locomotion, and Food Intake.

Authors:  Xianglong Zhu; David Ottenheimer; Ralph J DiLeone
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.