Literature DB >> 12665488

Noninvasive determination of coronary blood flow velocity with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after stent deployment.

Eike Nagel1, Thomas Thouet, Christoph Klein, Simon Schalla, Axel Bornstedt, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Jürgen Hug, Ernst Wellnhofer, Eckart Fleck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with coronary artery stents, no direct noninvasive coronary artery imaging is possible with magnetic resonance (MR). A well-established method for the assessment of the functional significance of a coronary lesion is the measurement of coronary flow reserve by invasive intracoronary Doppler. The purpose of the study was to determine coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) with MR after stent deployment. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients after successful PTCA and stent deployment were included. CFVR was measured perpendicular to the artery distal to the stent using phase-contrast velocity quantification at rest and during adenosine-stimulated hyperemia with a 1.5T MR tomograph (ACS NT, Philips). Measurements were repeated after 3 months and compared with invasive coronary angiography. In 18 patients, additional invasive Doppler flow measurements were obtained. CFVR could be determined in 29 of 38 (76%) of the patients. After 3 months, significant differences were obtained between coronary arteries with and without restenosis. Using a threshold of 1.2, a sensitivity of 83% with a specificity of 94% was achieved for > or =75% stenoses. CFVR with CMR was similar to Doppler results (r=0.87), with a mean relative difference of 7.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with preserved coronary microcirculating vasoreactivity that are suitable for MR coronary angiography and flow assessments, CMR measures of coronary blood flow velocities reserve may be used to detect in-stent restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12665488     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000060542.79482.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki; Ai Masukawa; Satoru Morita; Kazufumi Suzuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Satoru Morita; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Effects of intravenous atrial natriuretic peptide and nitroglycerin on coronary vasodilation and flow velocity determined using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nonischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Shoichi Ehara; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Kenji Matsumoto; Takao Hasegawa; Kenei Shimada; Masahiko Takagi; Akihisa Hanatani; Yasukatsu Izumi; Masahiro Terashima; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of myocardial viability and perfusion: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-11-01

Review 6.  Advanced flow MRI: emerging techniques and applications.

Authors:  M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Numerical analysis of the pressure drop across highly-eccentric coronary stenoses: application to the calculation of the fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  R Agujetas; M R González-Fernández; J M Nogales-Asensio; J M Montanero
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Coronary Flow Assessment Using Accelerated 4D Flow MRI With Respiratory Motion Correction.

Authors:  Carmen P S Blanken; Eric M Schrauben; Eva S Peper; Lukas M Gottwald; Bram F Coolen; Diederik F van Wijk; Jan J Piek; Gustav J Strijkers; R Nils Planken; Pim van Ooij; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-17

9.  Quantifying coronary sinus flow and global LV perfusion at 3T.

Authors:  Karin Markenroth Bloch; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Freddy Ståhlberg
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.