Stéphanie Delaere1, Jean Roeseler1, William D'hoore1, Pascal Matte1, Marc Reynaert1, Philippe Jolliet2, Thierry Sottiaux3, Giuseppe Liistro4. 1. Intensive Care Department, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. 2. Intensive Care Unit, Medical ICU Division, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. , Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce, Gosselies, Belgium. 4. Pneumology Unit, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc (UCL), Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 , Brussels, Belgium. giuseppe.liistro@clin.ucl.ac.be.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the respiratory muscle workload associated with pressure support ventilation (PSV) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV) in intubated and spontaneously breathing patients without COPD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study, intensive care unit university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty intubated patients, during early weaning, PSV settings made by clinician in charge of the patient, and two levels of PAV, set to counterbalance 80% (PAV 80) and 50% (PAV 50) of both elastic and resistive loads, respectively. The patients were ventilated in the following order: 1) PSV; 2) PAV 50 or PAV 80; 3) PSV; 4) PAV 80 or PAV 50; 5) PSV. PSV settings were kept constant. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial blood gases, breathing pattern and respiratory effort parameters at the end of each of the five steps. MAIN RESULTS: PSV and PAV 80 had the same effects on work of breathing (WOB). The pressure-time product (PTP) was significantly higher during PAV 80 than during PSV (90+/-76 and 61+/-56 cmH(2)O.s.min(-1), respectively, P <0.05). Tidal volume was comparable, albeit more variable with PAV 80 than with PSV (variation coefficient, 43% vs 25%, respectively, P <0.05). PAV 50 entailed a higher respiratory rate, lower tidal volume, and higher WOB and PTP than PSV and PAV 80. PaO(2)/FiO(2) and SaO(2) were lower with PAV 50 than with PSV and PAV 80. CONCLUSION: In a group of intubated spontaneously breathing non-COPD patients, PAV 80 and PSV were associated with comparable levels WOB, whereas PTP was higher during PAV 80. PAV 50 provided insufficient respiratory assistance.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the respiratory muscle workload associated with pressure support ventilation (PSV) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV) in intubated and spontaneously breathing patients without COPD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study, intensive care unit university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty intubated patients, during early weaning, PSV settings made by clinician in charge of the patient, and two levels of PAV, set to counterbalance 80% (PAV 80) and 50% (PAV 50) of both elastic and resistive loads, respectively. The patients were ventilated in the following order: 1) PSV; 2) PAV 50 or PAV 80; 3) PSV; 4) PAV 80 or PAV 50; 5) PSV. PSV settings were kept constant. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial blood gases, breathing pattern and respiratory effort parameters at the end of each of the five steps. MAIN RESULTS:PSV and PAV 80 had the same effects on work of breathing (WOB). The pressure-time product (PTP) was significantly higher during PAV 80 than during PSV (90+/-76 and 61+/-56 cmH(2)O.s.min(-1), respectively, P <0.05). Tidal volume was comparable, albeit more variable with PAV 80 than with PSV (variation coefficient, 43% vs 25%, respectively, P <0.05). PAV 50 entailed a higher respiratory rate, lower tidal volume, and higher WOB and PTP than PSV and PAV 80. PaO(2)/FiO(2) and SaO(2) were lower with PAV 50 than with PSV and PAV 80. CONCLUSION: In a group of intubated spontaneously breathing non-COPD patients, PAV 80 and PSV were associated with comparable levels WOB, whereas PTP was higher during PAV 80. PAV 50 provided insufficient respiratory assistance.
Authors: P Navalesi; P Hernandez; A Wongsa; D Laporta; P Goldberg; S B Gottfried Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: V M Ranieri; R Giuliani; L Mascia; S Grasso; V Petruzzelli; N Puntillo; G Perchiazzi; T Fiore; A Brienza Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 1996-07
Authors: L Appendini; A Purro; M Gudjonsdottir; P Baderna; A Patessio; S Zanaboni; C F Donner; A Rossi Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sarah M McMullen; Maureen Meade; Louise Rose; Karen Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Robert Doyle; Dietrich Henzler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 3.240