Literature DB >> 10228119

Physiologic response of ventilator-dependent patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to proportional assist ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure.

L Appendini1, A Purro, M Gudjonsdottir, P Baderna, A Patessio, S Zanaboni, C F Donner, A Rossi.   

Abstract

To investigate the physiologic effects of proportional assist ventilation (PAV) in difficult-to-wean, mechanically ventilated patients with advanced COPD, we measured in eight ICU patients the breathing pattern, neuromuscular drive (P0.1), lung mechanics, and inspiratory muscle effort (PTPdi and PTPpl) during both spontaneous breathing (SB) and ventilatory support with PAV, CPAP, and CPAP + PAV (in random sequence). PAV (volume assist [VA] and flow assist [FA]) was set as follows: dynamic lung elastance and inspiratory pulmonary resistance were measured during SB; then VA and FA were set to counterbalance the elastic and resistive loads exceeding the normal values, respectively, the inspiratory muscles bearing a normal elastic and resistive workload. CPAP was set close to dynamic intrinsic PEEP (8.3 +/- 3.4 cm H2O). We found significant reductions in P0.1 and PTPdi during both CPAP (-45 and -37%, respectively) and PAV (-50 and -48%, respectively). However, only the combination of PAV and CPAP brought P0.1 (1.69 +/- 0.97 cm H2O) and PTPdi (100 +/- 68 cm H2O. s) within normal values, and ameliorated the breathing pattern compared with SB (tidal volume: 0.69 +/- 0.33 versus 0.33 +/- 0.14 L; breathing frequency, 14.6 +/- 4.6 versus 21.0 +/- 6.5 breaths/min, respectively), without generating ineffective inspiratory efforts. We conclude that in difficult-to-wean COPD patients, (1) PAV improves ventilation and reduces both P0.1 and inspiratory muscle effort; (2) the combination of PAV and CPAP can unload the inspiratory muscles to values close to those found in normal subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10228119     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.5.9804130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  12 in total

1.  What is the "best PEEP" in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  H Wrigge; C Putensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Stress Testing the Respiratory System: Too Little or Too Much?

Authors:  Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: helmet versus facial mask.

Authors:  Paolo Navalesi; Roberta Costa; Piero Ceriana; Annalisa Carlucci; George Prinianakis; Massimo Antonelli; Giorgio Conti; Stefano Nava
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Respiratory muscle workload in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients without COPD: pressure support vs proportional assist ventilation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Delaere; Jean Roeseler; William D'hoore; Pascal Matte; Marc Reynaert; Philippe Jolliet; Thierry Sottiaux; Giuseppe Liistro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Proportional assist ventilation (PAV): a significant advance or a futile struggle between logic and practice?

Authors:  N Ambrosino; A Rossi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Is positive airway pressure therapy underutilized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?

Authors:  Hrishikesh Kulkarni; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Sleep during proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Alexopoulou; E Kondili; E Vakouti; M Klimathianaki; G Prinianakis; D Georgopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Respiratory load compensation during mechanical ventilation--proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors versus pressure support.

Authors:  Eumorfia Kondili; George Prinianakis; Christina Alexopoulou; Eleftheria Vakouti; Maria Klimathianaki; Dimitris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Noninvasive pressure support versus proportional assist ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Miguel Fernández-Vivas; Juan Caturla-Such; Javier González de la Rosa; José Acosta-Escribano; Bernabé Alvarez-Sánchez; José Cánovas-Robles
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Partial ventilatory support modalities in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah M McMullen; Maureen Meade; Louise Rose; Karen Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Robert Doyle; Dietrich Henzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.