Literature DB >> 12664111

PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern.

Gerhard W Goerres1, Cyrill Burger, Michael R Schwitter, Thai-Nia H Heidelberg, Burkhardt Seifert, Gustav K von Schulthess.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiration position, which is optimal for co-registration of abdominal CT images, and the corresponding positron emission tomography (PET) scan in a new combined PET/CT system. Ten patients (5 men, 5 women; age 57.7+/-15.3 years, age range 34-80 years) underwent imaging for tumor staging on a combined PET/CT scanner (Discovery LS, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.). The PET emission images were acquired during normal shallow breathing and during CT scanning the patients performed four different breathing tasks: free breathing (FB); maximum inspiration (MaxInsp); maximum expiration (MaxExp); and normal expiration (NormExp). NormExp was defined as the respiratory level that was reached when the patient first inhaled and then exhaled without forcing expiration, and then held the breath in this position. Movements of the spleen, liver, left and right kidney, and the bladder were measured by using the promontory of the sacrum as a reference point and measuring the distance from this point to the abdominal organs in the PET and CT images by two independent observers. Statistical comparison of the measured distances between the CT scans and the PET scan were made using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance served for the assessment of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. There was no significant difference between NormExp and FB indicating that both respiration protocols are suitable for PET/CT image co-registration of abdominal studies. In contrast, the MaxExp and MaxInsp protocol are not suitable. The NormExp and FB respiration protocol are both suitable for the co-registration of abdominal PET/CT studies. In most patients the mismatch of abdominal organs will be lower than the resolution of the final co-registered PET/CT image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12664111     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1548-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of a breathing protocol for PET/CT.

Authors:  Ramon de Juan; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas Berthold; Gustav K von Schulthess; Gerhard W Goerres
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Respiration artifacts in whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies with combined PET/CT tomographs employing spiral CT technology with 1 to 16 detector rows.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Sandra Rosenbaum; Patrick Veit; Jörg Stattaus; Stefan P Müller; Frank P Difilippo; Heiko Schöder; Osama Mawlawi; Fiona Roberts; Andreas Bockisch; Hilmar Kühl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Correlation between respiration-induced thoracic expansion and a shift of central structures.

Authors:  M Weckesser; L Stegger; K U Juergens; D Wormanns; W Heindel; O Schober
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Software-based fusion of PET and CT images for suspected recurrent lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Michio Senda; Tomohisa Okada; Setsu Sakamoto; Tsuneo Saga; Tatsuya Higashi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results.

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Martin S Judenhofer; Hans F Wehrl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Incorporation of preprocedural PET into CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases: a nonrigid image registration validation study.

Authors:  Peng Lei; Omkar Dandekar; David Widlus; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging?

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Hans F Wehrl; Armin Kolb; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Attenuation correction in 4D-PET using a single-phase attenuation map and rigidity-adaptive deformable registration.

Authors:  Faraz Kalantari; Jing Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  PET/CT artifacts.

Authors:  Todd M Blodgett; Ajeet S Mehta; Amar S Mehta; Charles M Laymon; Jonathan Carney; David W Townsend
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Barbara J Fueger; Kristen Yeom; Johannes Czernin; James W Sayre; Michael E Phelps; Martin S Allen-Auerbach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.