Literature DB >> 12661853

Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.

Amina Memon1, Lorraine Hope, James Bartlett, Ray Bull.   

Abstract

Eyewitness memory is vulnerable to information encountered prior to a lineup. Young (18-30 years) and older (60-80 years) witnesses viewed a crime video. Some witnesses were then exposed to mugshots of innocent suspects that included a critical foil. After a 48-h delay, all the witnesses took part in a target-absent lineup that included the critical foil and five new foils. Witnesses who picked one of the mugshots as the likely perpetrator showed inflated rates of choosing the critical foil from the lineup. Context reinstatement instructions did not reduce choices of innocent foils following mugshot exposure. Despite age-related increases in false choosing, age did not qualify other effects. The results are discussed in terms of commitment, source memory, and gist-based processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12661853     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: interference, transference, and commitment effects.

Authors:  J E Dysart; R C Lindsay; R Hammond; P Dupuis
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories.

Authors:  J S Neuschatz; D G Payne; J M Lampinen; M P Toglia
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-01

3.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.

Authors:  J H Searcy; J C Bartlett; A Memon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

5.  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame.

Authors:  J Dywan; L Jacoby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-09

6.  False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; L Strater; A Fulton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

7.  Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; A Fulton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-05

8.  Response latencies for false memories: gist-based processes in normal aging.

Authors:  P A Tun; A Wingfield; M J Rosen; L Blanchard
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-06

Review 9.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Replicating distinctive facial features in lineups: identification performance in young versus older adults.

Authors:  Stephen P Badham; Kimberley A Wade; Hannah J E Watts; Natalie G Woods; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

2.  Feelings of familiarity and false memory for specific associations resulting from mugshot exposure.

Authors:  Alan W Kersten; Julie L Earles
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

3.  The effects of repeated lineups and delay on eyewitness identification.

Authors:  Wenbo Lin; Michael J Strube; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

4.  Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality.

Authors:  Sergii Yaremenko; Melanie Sauerland; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Vanessa Taler; Charles A Collin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-21

6.  The Difference between Right and Wrong: Accuracy of Older and Younger Adults' Story Recall.

Authors:  Danielle K Davis; Nicole Alea; Susan Bluck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.