Literature DB >> 11315661

Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories.

J S Neuschatz1, D G Payne, J M Lampinen, M P Toglia.   

Abstract

The phenomenology of false memories was investigated in three experiments in which participants heard two experimenters read lists of items that were related to critical nonpresented items. In Experiments 1, following a recognition memory test, participants rated the phenomenological characteristics of their memories immediately and after a 48-hour delay. False recognition was prevalent and on several dimensions participants rated their true memories as more vivid than their false memories. In Experiments 2 and 3, following the study phase, participants were warned about the phenomenological differences between true and false memories and were instructed to use this information to avoid reporting nonpresented items. This type of warning was ineffective at reducing false recall (Experiment 2) and false recognition (Experiment 3) relative to unwarned participants. Importantly, the inability of explicit warnings to impact illusory recollections demonstrates that the false memories cannot be attributed simply to a criterion shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11315661     DOI: 10.1080/09658210042000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  25 in total

1.  Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts.

Authors:  D A Gallo; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.

Authors:  Amina Memon; Lorraine Hope; James Bartlett; Ray Bull
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

3.  The reliability of the DRM paradigm as a measure of individual differences in false memories.

Authors:  Irene V Blair; Alison P Lenton; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

4.  The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollection.

Authors:  David A Gallo; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

5.  The effect of warnings on false memories in young and older adults.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Anderson D Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

6.  Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition.

Authors:  John G Seamon; Chun R Luo; Jonathan J Kopecky; Catherine A Price; Leeatt Rothschld; Nicholas S Fung; Michael A Schwartz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

7.  Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

8.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; David T W Tang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

Review 9.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

10.  How similar is false recognition to veridical recognition objectively and subjectively?

Authors:  Jerwen Jou; Yolanda E Matus; James W Aldridge; Dawn M Rogers; Ryan L Zimmerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.