Literature DB >> 23150053

Replicating distinctive facial features in lineups: identification performance in young versus older adults.

Stephen P Badham1, Kimberley A Wade, Hannah J E Watts, Natalie G Woods, Elizabeth A Maylor.   

Abstract

Criminal suspects with distinctive facial features, such as tattoos or bruising, may stand out in a police lineup. To prevent suspects from being unfairly identified on the basis of their distinctive feature, the police often manipulate lineup images to ensure that all of the members appear similar. Recent research shows that replicating a distinctive feature across lineup members enhances eyewitness identification performance, relative to removing that feature on the target. In line with this finding, the present study demonstrated that with young adults (n = 60; mean age = 20), replication resulted in more target identifications than did removal in target-present lineups and that replication did not impair performance, relative to removal, in target-absent lineups. Older adults (n = 90; mean age = 74) performed significantly worse than young adults, identifying fewer targets and more foils; moreover, older adults showed a minimal benefit from replication over removal. This pattern is consistent with the associative deficit hypothesis of aging, such that older adults form weaker links between faces and their distinctive features. Although replication did not produce much benefit over removal for older adults, it was not detrimental to their performance. Therefore, the results suggest that replication may not be as beneficial to older adults as it is to young adults and demonstrate a new practical implication of age-related associative deficits in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23150053     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0339-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Memory for temporal context: effects of ageing, encoding instructions, and retrieval strategies.

Authors:  Christine Bastin; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-01

3.  The effects of aging on the recognition of different types of associations.

Authors:  Christine Bastin; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Adult age differences in memory for name-face associations: The effects of intentional and incidental learning.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Yee Lee Shing; Angela Kilb; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Ulman Lindenberger; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-02

5.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

6.  Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features.

Authors:  Theodora Zarkadi; Kimberley A Wade; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  Aging and memory for pictures of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J E Leslie; A Tubbs; A Fulton
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-09

8.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence.

Authors:  J L Horn; R B Cattell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1967

9.  Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Old; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.