Literature DB >> 12658407

Bile duct clearance, endoscopic or laparoscopic?

Masao Tanaka1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) has become the gold standard nonoperative modality for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Morbidity is 2%-10%, and mortality less than 2%. Immediate complications include bleeding, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and duodenal perforation, but many of these can be prevented by using various tools, including an alternating coagulating and cutting diathermy unit, routine biliary stenting, frequent use of guide-wires to avoid precutting, and mechanical lithotripsy. Long-term results have shown that the stone recurrence rate reaches 15%, probably due to a strong recurrent tendency inherent to bilirubinate stones. Choice of the appropriate lithotomy modality is of paramount importance to reduce invasiveness. ES is the choice for recurrent or residual stones and for choledocholithiasis alone. Acalculous gallbladders left in place carry no risk of acute cholecystitis. In patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, CBD stones should be removed via the cystic duct or by choledochotomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, not to preserve the sphincter of Oddi but to reduce the interventional burden. Safety and safeguards of papillary balloon dilation must still be investigated in a limited number of institutions. Marked progress in lithotomy/lithotripsy procedures has almost obviated the need for laparotomy. Patients with CBD stones benefit from the less invasive and more efficient modalities of transpapillary, percutaneous, and laparoscopic lithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12658407     DOI: 10.1007/s005340200100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  5 in total

1.  [Surgical interdisciplinarity-abdomen excluding the pelvis].

Authors:  T Junginger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Management of common bile duct stones: controversies and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Gali Even Bendahan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-16

4.  Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Magnus Nilsson; Carl-Eric Leijonmarck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting.

Authors:  Matias E Czerwonko; Juan Pekolj; Pedro Uad; Oscar Mazza; Rodrigo Sanchez-Claria; Guillermo Arbues; Eduardo de Santibañes; Martín de Santibañes; Martín Palavecino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.