Literature DB >> 12657702

Genetic mapping of variation in spatial learning in the mouse.

Daniela Steinberger1, David S Reynolds, Pushpindar Ferris, Rachael Lincoln, Susmita Datta, Joanna Stanley, Andrea Paterson, Gerard R Dawson, Jonathan Flint.   

Abstract

Inbred strains of mice are known to differ in their performance in the Morris water maze task, a test of spatial discrimination and place navigation in rodents, but the genetic basis of individual variation in spatial learning is unknown. We have mapped genetic effects that contribute to the difference between two strains, DBA/2 and C57BL6/J, using an F2 intercross and methods to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL). We found two QTL, one on chromosome 4 and one on chromosome 12, that influence behavior in the probe trial of the water maze (genome-wide significance p = 0.017 and 0.015, respectively). By including tests of avoidance conditioning and behavior in a novel environment, we show that the QTL on chromosomes 4 and 12 specifically influence variation in spatial learning. QTL that influence differences in fearful behavior (on chromosomes 1, 3, 7, 15, and 19) operate while mice are trained in the water maze apparatus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657702      PMCID: PMC6742017     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  Enhanced efficiency of quantitative trait loci mapping analysis based on multivariate complexes of quantitative traits.

Authors:  A B Korol; Y I Ronin; A M Itskovich; J Peng; E Nevo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Can molecules explain long-term potentiation?

Authors:  J R Sanes; J W Lichtman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Quantitative trait locus mapping in laboratory mice derived from a replicated selection experiment for open-field activity.

Authors:  M G Turri; N D Henderson; J C DeFries; J Flint
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls.

Authors:  J Flint; R Mott
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Age-related cognitive deficits, impaired long-term potentiation and reduction in synaptic marker density in mice lacking the beta-amyloid precursor protein.

Authors:  G R Dawson; G R Seabrook; H Zheng; D W Smith; S Graham; G O'Dowd; B J Bowery; S Boyce; M E Trumbauer; H Y Chen; L H Van der Ploeg; D J Sirinathsinghji
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Faster is not surer--a comparison of C57BL/6J and 129S2/Sv mouse strains in the watermaze.

Authors:  C Contet; J N Rawlins; D M Bannerman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Stress impairs performance in spatial water maze learning tasks.

Authors:  C Hölscher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-08

9.  Genome-wide epistatic interaction analysis reveals complex genetic determinants of circadian behavior in mice.

Authors:  K Shimomura; S S Low-Zeddies; D P King; T D Steeves; A Whiteley; J Kushla; P D Zemenides; A Lin; M H Vitaterna; G A Churchill; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  QTL analysis identifies multiple behavioral dimensions in ethological tests of anxiety in laboratory mice.

Authors:  M G Turri; S R Datta; J DeFries; N D Henderson; J Flint
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  7 in total

1.  Intrasession and intersession habituation in mice: from inbred strain variability to linkage analysis.

Authors:  Valerie J Bolivar
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Selection of mice for high scores of elementary logical task solution.

Authors:  O V Perepelkina; V A Golibrodo; I G Lilp; I I Poletaeva
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-13

3.  Multiple genetic loci affect place learning and memory performance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricka A Williams-Simon; Christopher Posey; Samuel Mitchell; Enoch Ng'oma; James A Mrkvicka; Troy Zars; Elizabeth G King
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  The influence of visual ability on learning and memory performance in 13 strains of mice.

Authors:  Richard E Brown; Aimée A Wong
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  A mutant mouse with a highly specific contextual fear-conditioning deficit found in an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screen.

Authors:  Leon G Reijmers; Jennifer K Coats; Mathew T Pletcher; Tim Wiltshire; Lisa M Tarantino; Mark Mayford
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Modeling the quantitative nature of neurodevelopmental disorders using Collaborative Cross mice.

Authors:  Remco T Molenhuis; Hilgo Bruining; Myrna J V Brandt; Petra E van Soldt; Hanifa J Abu-Toamih Atamni; J Peter H Burbach; Fuad A Iraqi; Richard F Mott; Martien J H Kas
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 7.509

7.  Selection of Mice for Object Permanence Cognitive Task Solution.

Authors:  Olga Viktorovna Perepelkina; Inga Igorevna Poletaeva
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2022-08-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.