Literature DB >> 17351136

The influence of visual ability on learning and memory performance in 13 strains of mice.

Richard E Brown1, Aimée A Wong.   

Abstract

We calculated visual ability in 13 strains of mice (129SI/Sv1mJ, A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cByJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, CAST/EiJ, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, MOLF/EiJ, SJL/J, SM/J, and SPRET/EiJ) on visual detection, pattern discrimination, and visual acuity and tested these and other mice of the same strains in a behavioral test battery that evaluated visuo-spatial learning and memory, conditioned odor preference, and motor learning. Strain differences in visual acuity accounted for a significant proportion of the variance between strains in measures of learning and memory in the Morris water maze. Strain differences in motor learning performance were not influenced by visual ability. Conditioned odor preference was enhanced in mice with visual defects. These results indicate that visual ability must be accounted for when testing for strain differences in learning and memory in mice because differences in performance in many tasks may be due to visual deficits rather than differences in higher order cognitive functions. These results have significant implications for the search for the neural and genetic basis of learning and memory in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351136      PMCID: PMC1838554          DOI: 10.1101/lm.473907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  70 in total

1.  Confirmation of contextual fear conditioning QTLs by short-term selection.

Authors:  R A Radcliffe; M V Lowe; J M Wehner
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.

Authors:  G T Prusky; P W West; R M Douglas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; T Abel; E R Kandel; R Bourtchouladze
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice.

Authors:  A A Wong; R E Brown
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  A simple and reliable test of olfactory learning and memory in mice.

Authors:  H M Schellinck; C A Forestell; V M LoLordo
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-08

Review 7.  Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse.

Authors:  B Chang; N L Hawes; R E Hurd; M T Davisson; S Nusinowitz; J R Heckenlively
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Mouse models of impaired fear memory exhibit deficits in amygdalar LTP.

Authors:  Lesley A Schimanski; Peter V Nguyen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 9.  Behavioral profiles of inbred strains on novel olfactory, spatial and emotional tests for reference memory in mice.

Authors:  A Holmes; C C Wrenn; A P Harris; K E Thayer; J N Crawley
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 10.  Genetic neuroscience of mammalian learning and memory.

Authors:  Susumu Tonegawa; Kazu Nakazawa; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  50 in total

1.  Reevaluating hippocampus-dependent learning in FVB/N mice.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Bridget M McKay; John F Disterhoft; Craig Weiss
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Strained in Planning Your Mouse Background? Using the HPA Stress Axis as a Biological Readout for Backcrossing Strategies.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chan; Amanda B Houghton; Tracy L Bale
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Genetic relationship between ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and other ethanol phenotypes in 15 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Sleep Consolidates Motor Learning of Complex Movement Sequences in Mice.

Authors:  Hirotaka Nagai; Luisa de Vivo; Michele Bellesi; Maria Felice Ghilardi; Giulio Tononi; Chiara Cirelli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Vision Drives Accurate Approach Behavior during Prey Capture in Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hoy; Iryna Yavorska; Michael Wehr; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Introducing Therioepistemology: the study of how knowledge is gained from animal research.

Authors:  Joseph P Garner; Brianna N Gaskill; Elin M Weber; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

7.  Longitudinal In Vivo Monitoring of the CNS Demonstrates the Efficacy of Gene Therapy in a Sheep Model of CLN5 Batten Disease.

Authors:  Nadia L Mitchell; Katharina N Russell; Martin P Wellby; Hollie E Wicky; Lucia Schoderboeck; Graham K Barrell; Tracy R Melzer; Steven J Gray; Stephanie M Hughes; David N Palmer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Intranasal injection of recombinant human erythropoietin improves cognitive and visual impairments in chronic cerebral ischemia rats.

Authors:  Yanhui Zhou; Bin Sun; Junhong Guo; Guohong Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2020-08-25

9.  Amyloid-peptide vaccinations reduce {beta}-amyloid plaques but exacerbate vascular deposition and inflammation in the retina of Alzheimer's transgenic mice.

Authors:  Bingqian Liu; Suhail Rasool; Zhikuan Yang; Charles G Glabe; Steven S Schreiber; Jian Ge; Zhiqun Tan
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Over-expression of a human chromosome 22q11.2 segment including TXNRD2, COMT and ARVCF developmentally affects incentive learning and working memory in mice.

Authors:  Go Suzuki; Kathryn M Harper; Takeshi Hiramoto; Birgit Funke; MoonSook Lee; Gina Kang; Mahalah Buell; Mark A Geyer; Raju Kucherlapati; Bernice Morrow; Pekka T Männistö; Soh Agatsuma; Noboru Hiroi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.