Literature DB >> 12657110

CA125 levels are a weak predictor of optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

S Memarzadeh1, S B Lee, J S Berek, R Farias-Eisner.   

Abstract

The utility of preoperative CA125 to predict optimal primary tumor cytoreduction in patients with advanced (stages IIIC and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial. In this paper, we retrospectively review patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery from 1989 to 2001. Ninety-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. All patients had preoperative CA125 levels measured. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed. Optimal cytoreduction was defined as largest volume of residual disease < 1 cm in maximal dimension. Mean values were compared with t-test on a log scale when needed. The optimal cut-point for discriminating between those with vs. without optimal cytoreduction was determined using the receiver operator curve (ROC) method. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 73% of patients. Among patients with optimal cytoreductive status the mean CA125 level was 569, while among patients with suboptimal cytoreduction the mean CA125 level was 1520 (P < 0.007). A CA125 level of 912 was identified as the optimal cut-point to distinguish the two groups. Using this CA125 level, the sensitivity of this test in predicting optimal cytoreduction was 58% and the specificity was 54%. The positive predictive value of CA125 for optimal cytoreduction was 78% and the negative predictive value was 31%. We conclude that CA125 level is a weak positive and negative predictor of optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The CA125 level should not be used as a primary predictor of the outcome of cytoreductive surgery and should be viewed in the context of all other preoperative features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657110     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  22 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic and predictive value of CA-125 in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: potentials and pitfalls.

Authors:  Iván Díaz-Padilla; Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak; Lucas Minig; Marcus Q Bernardini; Josep María Del Campo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Distinctive DNA methylation patterns of cell-free plasma DNA in women with malignant ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Thomas E Liggett; Anatoliy Melnikov; Qilong Yi; Charles Replogle; Wei Hu; Jacob Rotmensch; Aparna Kamat; Anil K Sood; Victor Levenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  A framework for a personalized surgical approach to ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Alpa M Nick; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Can primary optimal cytoreduction be predicted in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer preoperatively?

Authors:  Azam-Sadat Mousavi; Marjan Moradi Mazhari; Mitra Modares Guilani; Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami; Nadereh Behtash; Setareh Akhavan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  A novel index for preoperative, non-invasive prediction of macro-radical primary surgery in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer-a part of the Danish prospective pelvic mass study.

Authors:  Mona Aarenstrup Karlsen; Carsten Fagö-Olsen; Estrid Høgdall; Tine Henrichsen Schnack; Ib Jarle Christensen; Lotte Nedergaard; Lene Lundvall; Magnus Christian Lydolph; Svend Aage Engelholm; Claus Høgdall
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-20

6.  The use of CT findings to predict extent of tumor at primary surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen Glaser; Michelle Torres; Bohyun Kim; Giovanni Aletti; Amy Weaver; Andrea Mariani; Lynn Hartmann; William Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intra-abdominal sites of implants to predict likelihood of suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Mercedes Espada; Jose R Garcia-Flores; Mar Jimenez; Elena Alvarez-Moreno; Mar De Haro; Lucia Gonzalez-Cortijo; Gines Hernandez-Cortes; Vicente Martinez-Vega; Ricardo Sainz De La Cuesta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A multicenter prospective trial evaluating the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Svetlana Mironov; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Harold Paul; Masayoshi Hosaka; Carol A Aghajanian; Mario M Leitao; Ginger J Gardner; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  When should surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer take place?

Authors:  Igor E Martinek; Sean Kehoe
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Role of CT scan-based and clinical evaluation in the preoperative prediction of optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective trial.

Authors:  G Ferrandina; G Sallustio; A Fagotti; G Vizzielli; A Paglia; E Cucci; A Margariti; L Aquilani; G Garganese; G Scambia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.