Literature DB >> 12650525

Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production.

Anna B Auerbach1, Rada Norinsky, Weilan Ho, Kasia Losos, Qiuxia Guo, Samprit Chatterjee, Alexandra L Joyner.   

Abstract

Transgenic mouse production via pronuclear microinjection is a complex process consisting of a number of sequential steps. Many different factors contribute to the effectiveness of each step and thus influence the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production. The response of egg donor females to superovulation, the fertilization rate, egg survival after injection, ability of manipulated embryos to implant and develop to term, and concentration and purity of the injected DNA all contribute to transgenic production efficiency. We evaluated and compared the efficiency of transgenic mouse production using four different egg donor mouse strains: B6D2/F1 hybrids, Swiss Webster (SW) outbred, and inbred FVB/N and C57BL/6. The data included experiments involving approximately 350 DNA transgene constructs performed by a high capacity core transgenic mouse facility. Significant influences of particular genetic backgrounds on the efficiency of different steps of the production process were found. Except for egg production, FVB/N mice consistently produced the highest efficiency of transgenic mouse production at each step of the process. B6D2/F2 hybrid eggs are also quite efficient, but lyze more frequently than FVB/N eggs after DNA microinjection. SW eggs on the other hand block at the 1-cell stage more often than eggs from the other strains. Finally, using C57BL/6 eggs the main limiting factor is that the fetuses derived from injected eggs do not develop to term as often as the other strains. Based on our studies, the procedure for transgenic mouse production can be modified for each egg donor strain in order to overcome any deficiencies, and thus to increase the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12650525     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022166921766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  13 in total

1.  In vitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm.

Authors:  J M Sztein; J S Farley; L E Mobraaten
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  The 1999 Reginald Thomson Lecture. Custom-built mice: unique discovery tools in biomedical research.

Authors:  B A Croy
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  A simple polymerase chain reaction assay for genotyping the retinal degeneration mutation (Pdeb(rd1)) in FVB/N-derived transgenic mice.

Authors:  E Giménez; L Montoliu
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  SWR: an inbred strain suitable for generating transgenic mice.

Authors:  G E Osman; D P Jacobson; S W Li; L E Hood; H D Liggitt; W C Ladiges
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1997-04

5.  Influence of genetic background and media components on the development of mouse embryos in vitro.

Authors:  L Scott; D G Whittingham
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  Visualization of large DNA molecules by electron microscopy with polyamines: application to the analysis of yeast endogenous and artificial chromosomes.

Authors:  L Montoliu; C T Bock; G Schütz; H Zentgraf
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-03-03       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  FVB/N: an inbred mouse strain preferable for transgenic analyses.

Authors:  M Taketo; A C Schroeder; L E Mobraaten; K B Gunning; G Hanten; R R Fox; T H Roderick; C L Stewart; F Lilly; C T Hansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gene transfer efficiency during gestation and the influence of co-transfer of non-manipulated embryos on production of transgenic mice.

Authors:  R S Canseco; A E Sparks; R L Page; C G Russell; J L Johnson; W H Velander; R E Pearson; W N Drohan; F C Gwazdauskas
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Localization of a retroviral element within the rd gene coding for the beta subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase.

Authors:  C Bowes; T Li; W N Frankel; M Danciger; J M Coffin; M L Applebury; D B Farber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  30 in total

1.  Reevaluating hippocampus-dependent learning in FVB/N mice.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Bridget M McKay; John F Disterhoft; Craig Weiss
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Superovulation strategies for 6 commonly used mouse strains.

Authors:  Charlie Luo; Juliana Zuñiga; Earnessa Edison; Shana Palla; Wenli Dong; Jan Parker-Thornburg
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Lentiviral transgenesis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeifer
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Virtues and limitations of the preimplantation mouse embryo as a model system.

Authors:  Robert A Taft
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Genetic variation in C57BL/6 ES cell lines and genetic instability in the Bruce4 C57BL/6 ES cell line.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Hughes; Yun Yan Qu; Suzanne J Genik; Robert H Lyons; Christopher D Pacheco; Andrew P Lieberman; Linda C Samuelson; Igor O Nasonkin; Sally A Camper; Margaret L Van Keuren; Thomas L Saunders
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Pronuclear Injection-Based Targeted Transgenesis.

Authors:  Samantha L P Schilit; Masato Ohtsuka; Rolen M Quadros; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-11

7.  Genetically Engineered Mice by Pronuclear DNA microinjection.

Authors:  Janet L Demayo; Jie Wang; Dongcai Liang; Ruina Zhang; Francesco J Demayo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 8.  Improving the generation of genomic-type transgenic mice by ICSI.

Authors:  Pedro N Moreira; Julio Pozueta; Miriam Pérez-Crespo; Fernando Valdivieso; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Simple databases to monitor the generation and organisation of transgenic mouse colonies.

Authors:  Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 10.  Novel approaches to models of Alzheimer's disease pathology for drug screening and development.

Authors:  Laura Shaughnessy; Beth Chamblin; Lori McMahon; Ayyappan Nair; Mary Beth Thomas; John Wakefield; Frank Koentgen; Ram Ramabhadran
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.