Literature DB >> 17372844

Improving the generation of genomic-type transgenic mice by ICSI.

Pedro N Moreira1, Julio Pozueta, Miriam Pérez-Crespo, Fernando Valdivieso, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán, Lluís Montoliu.   

Abstract

Transgenes included in genomic-type constructs, such as yeast artificial chromosomes (YAC), P1-derived artificial chromosomes, or bacterial artificial chromosomes (BAC), are normally correctly expressed, according to the endogenous expression pattern of the homologous locus, because their large size usually ensures the inclusion of all regulatory elements required for proper gene expression. The use of these large genomic-type transgenes is therefore the method of choice to overcome most position effects, commonly associated with standard-type transgenes, and to guarantee the faithful transgene expression. However, in spite of the different methods available, including pronuclear microinjection and the use of embryonic stem cells as vehicles for genomic transgenes, the generation of transgenic animals with BACs and, particularly, with YACs can be demanding, because of the low efficiencies requiring extensive microinjection sessions and/or higher number of oocytes. Recently, we have explored the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) into metaphase II oocytes as an alternative method for the generation of YAC transgenic mice. Our results suggest that the use of transgenic strategies based on ICSI significantly enhances the efficiency of YAC transgenesis by at least one order of magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17372844     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-007-9075-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  27 in total

1.  Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production.

Authors:  Anna B Auerbach; Rada Norinsky; Weilan Ho; Kasia Losos; Qiuxia Guo; Samprit Chatterjee; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Sperm-mediated gene transfer: applications and implications.

Authors:  Kevin Smith; Corrado Spadafora
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  CMV-driven expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in male germ cells of transgenic mice and its effect on fertility.

Authors:  G Villuendas; A Gutiérrez-Adán; A Jiménez; C Rojo; E R Roldán; B Pintado
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2001-10

4.  Effect of flanking matrix attachment regions on the expression of microinjected transgenes during preimplantation development of mouse embryos.

Authors:  A Gutiérrez-Adán; B Pintado
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Effect of transgene concentration, flanking matrix attachment regions, and RecA-coating on the efficiency of mouse transgenesis mediated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Pedro Nuno Moreira; Miriam Pérez-Crespo; Miguel Angel Ramírez; Julio Pozueta; Lluís Montoliu; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Production of transgenic-clone pigs by the combination of ICSI-mediated gene transfer with somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Hideto Ueda; Ryo Tomii; Katsutoshi Naruse; Hiroshi Nagashima
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Artificial chromosome transgenesis in pigmentary research.

Authors:  Patricia Giraldo; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Pigment Cell Res       Date:  2002-08

8.  Mouse ICSI with frozen-thawed sperm: the impact of sperm freezing procedure and sperm donor strain.

Authors:  Pedro N Moreira; Adela Jimenéz; Raul Fernández; Ninoska Bury-Madrid; Julio De la Fuente; Belen Pintado; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.609

9.  A yeast artificial chromosome covering the tyrosinase gene confers copy number-dependent expression in transgenic mice.

Authors:  A Schedl; L Montoliu; G Kelsey; G Schütz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The majority of G0 transgenic mice are derived from mosaic embryos.

Authors:  C B Whitelaw; A J Springbett; J Webster; J Clark
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.788

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Modeling human neurodegenerative diseases in transgenic systems.

Authors:  Miguel A Gama Sosa; Rita De Gasperi; Gregory A Elder
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to generate transgenic animals.

Authors:  Stefan Moisyadi; Joseph M Kaminski; Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Mendel: a simple excel workbook to compare the observed and expected distributions of genotypes/phenotypes in transgenic and knockout mouse crosses involving up to three unlinked loci by means of a χ2 test.

Authors:  Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Prospects for the use of artificial chromosomes and minichromosome-like episomes in gene therapy.

Authors:  Sara Pérez-Luz; Javier Díaz-Nido
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-24

5.  Generation of transgenic mice with megabase-sized human yeast artificial chromosomes by yeast spheroplast-embryonic stem cell fusion.

Authors:  Liangping Li; Thomas Blankenstein
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  A survey to establish performance standards for the production of transgenic mice.

Authors:  Thomas J Fielder; Laura Barrios; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Animal models of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 for the development of prophylactic and therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Marcel Renn; Eva Bartok; Thomas Zillinger; Gunther Hartmann; Rayk Behrendt
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 12.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.