Literature DB >> 12647887

Surface forms and grammatical functions: past tense and passive participle use by children with specific language impairment.

Laurence B Leonard1, Patricia Deevy, Carol A Miller, Leila Rauf, Monique Charest, Kurtz Robert.   

Abstract

Children with specific language impairment (SLI) use past tense -ed in fewer obligatory contexts than younger normally developing children matched for mean length of utterance (MLU). In this study, the use of passive participle -ed (e.g., kissed in The frog got kissed by the kitty) as well as past tense -ed was examined in children with SLI, normally developing children matched for age (ND-A), and normally developing children matched for MLU (ND-MLU). The children with SLI used both past tense -ed and passive participle -ed in fewer obligatory contexts than bath the ND-A and the ND-MLU children. Only the children with SLI had greater difficulty with past tense -ed than with passive participle -ed. The pattern of findings indicates that the surface properties of -ed cannot adequately account for the past tense -ed difficulty shown by the children with SLI. However, the fact that the children with SLI were less consistant than the ND-MLU children in using passive participle -ed suggests that either the surface properties of -ed are responsible for a portion of the difficulty or these children have a separate, non-tense-related deficit in the area of verb morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647887     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/004)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

Review 1.  Past Tense Production in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment Across Germanic Languages: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Windi C Krok; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Production of Passives by Children with Specific Language Impairment Acquiring English or Cantonese.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Anita M-Y Wong; Patricia Deevy; Stephanie F Stokes; Paul Fletcher
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2006-04-01

3.  Evaluating the Grammars of Children Who Speak Nonmainstream Dialects of English.

Authors:  Janna B Oetting; Ryan Lee; Karmen L Porter
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun

4.  Passive participle marking by African American English-speaking children reared in poverty.

Authors:  Sonja L Pruitt; Janna B Oetting; Michael Hegarty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The Role of Frequency in Learning Morphophonological Alternations: Implications for Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tomas; Katherine Demuth; Peter Petocz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The role of nonverbal working memory in morphosyntactic processing by children with specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Susan Ellis Weismer; Meghan M Davidson; Ishanti Gangopadhyay; Heidi Sindberg; Hettie Roebuck; Margarita Kaushanskaya
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Problems with tense marking in children with specific language impairment: not how but when.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.