Literature DB >> 12646137

An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.

J M Kilner1, Y Paulignan, S J Blakemore.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that actions are intrinsically linked to perception and that imagining, observing, preparing, or in any way representing an action excites the motor programs used to execute that same action. There is neurophysiological evidence that certain brain regions involved in executing actions are activated by the mere observation of action (the so-called "mirror system;" ). However, it is unknown whether this mirror system causes interference between observed and simultaneously executed movements. In this study we test the hypothesis that, because of the overlap between action observation and execution, observed actions should interfere with incongruous executed actions. Subjects made arm movements while observing either a robot or another human making the same or qualitatively different arm movements. Variance in the executed movement was measured as an index of interference to the movement. The results demonstrate that observing another human making incongruent movements has a significant interference effect on executed movements. However, we found no evidence that this interference effect occurred when subjects observed a robotic arm making incongruent movements. These results suggest that the simultaneous activation of the overlapping neural networks that process movement observation and execution infers a measurable cost to motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12646137     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00165-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  209 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account.

Authors:  Markus Paulus
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-06

Review 3.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

4.  Event coding and motor priming: how attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties.

Authors:  Brenda Ocampo; David R Painter; Ada Kritikos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation.

Authors:  Rémi L Capa; Peter J Marshall; Thomas F Shipley; Robin N Salesse; Cédric A Bouquet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-29

7.  Automatic imitation in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Dynamic Modulation of Beta Band Cortico-Muscular Coupling Induced by Audio-Visual Rhythms.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Sylvie Nozaradan; Laurel Trainor; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-05

9.  Recall of observed actions modulates the end-state comfort effect just like recall of one's own actions.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; En Fu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.