Literature DB >> 12644283

Inbred mouse strain differences in the establishment of long-term fear memory.

Seth A Balogh1, Jeanne M Wehner.   

Abstract

Studies describing variations in fear-related memory in inbred mouse strains typically focus upon 24 h retention. As a consequence, little is known about strain differences in the establishment of longer lasting memories of aversive events. In the present study, male mice from the strains A/Ibg, AKR/J, BALB/cByJ, CBA/J, C3H/HeIbg, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, LP/J, SJL/J and 129/SvevTac were tested 24 h, 14, or 60 days after contextual and auditory-cued fear conditioning. Consistent with previous data, 24 h after conditioning these strains exhibited substantial variation in levels of memory for the context and the auditory cue as measured by freezing scores. Sixty days after training, most strains exhibited some forgetting of the context and auditory cue, and again there was significant strain variation. Strain rankings at 60-day retention were similar to that at 24 h with a significant genetic correlation between freezing values for the two time periods. Fourteen days following training, nearly all strains exhibited generalized freezing, a behavioral phenotype originally observed in C57BL/6 but not DBA/2 mice. These data confirm that cognitive differences exist between several popular inbred mouse strains during 24 h contextual fear recall. In addition, they extend these differences into retention time frames longer than those typically used and reveal several unique learning profiles of mouse strains that may be useful in furthering our understanding of how memories are formed. Emotionally arousing situations are often recalled a great deal of time after an event. Therefore, a more complete picture of the biochemical and genetic underpinnings of learning and memory will benefit from studies using time points that assess time points beyond 24 h retention. The utility of the 14-day hyper responsiveness phenotype as a potential model for fear-related psychopathology is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12644283     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00279-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  33 in total

1.  Genetic background modulates behavioral impairments in R6/2 mice and suggests a role for dominant genetic modifiers in Huntington’s disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Randi-Michelle Cowin; Nghiem Bui; Deanna Graham; Jennie R Green; Lisa A Yuva-Paylor; Andreas Weiss; Richard Paylor
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Differences in hippocampal CREB phosphorylation in trace fear conditioning of two inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Yoo Kyeong Hwang; Jae-Chun Song; Seol-Heui Han; Jeiwon Cho; Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Jung-Soo Han
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Strain difference in the effect of infralimbic cortex lesions on fear extinction in rats.

Authors:  Chun-hui Chang; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Concentration- and age-dependent effects of chronic caffeine on contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; David Braak; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Differences in memory development among C57BL/6NCrl, 129S2/SvPasCrl, and FVB/NCrl mice after delay and trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Amelia March; David Borchelt; Todd Golde; Christopher Janus
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  Strain-dependent effects of acute, chronic, and withdrawal from chronic nicotine on fear conditioning.

Authors:  George S Portugal; Derek S Wilkinson; Justin W Kenney; Colleen Sullivan; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Immune status influences fear and anxiety responses in mice after acute stress exposure.

Authors:  Sarah M Clark; Joseph Sand; T Chase Francis; Anitha Nagaraju; Kerry C Michael; Achsah D Keegan; Alexander Kusnecov; Todd D Gould; Leonardo H Tonelli
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 7.217

8.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Constitutive activation of the G-protein subunit Galphas within forebrain neurons causes PKA-dependent alterations in fear conditioning and cortical Arc mRNA expression.

Authors:  Michele P Kelly; York-Fong Cheung; Christopher Favilla; Steven J Siegel; Stephen J Kanes; Miles D Houslay; Ted Abel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Fear conditioning increases NREM sleep.

Authors:  Kevin Hellman; Ted Abel
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.