Literature DB >> 20501325

Differences in hippocampal CREB phosphorylation in trace fear conditioning of two inbred mouse strains.

Yoo Kyeong Hwang1, Jae-Chun Song, Seol-Heui Han, Jeiwon Cho, Dani R Smith, Michela Gallagher, Jung-Soo Han.   

Abstract

The effects of genetic background on fear trace conditioning were evaluated in relation to phosphorylated levels of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in the hippocampus using two different inbred strains of mice, C57BL/6 and DBA/2. The male mice received a trace fear conditioning protocol and unpaired control groups were included to assess nonassociative effects on test performance. Both C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice with paired training displayed higher freezing responses during testing than those with unpaired training, respectively. The C57BL/6 mice with paired training also displayed higher freezing responses to the tone-CS during testing than the DBA/2 mice with paired training. Because much evidence implicates the hippocampus as an important neural substrate for trace fear conditioning, the engagement of the hippocampus was examined after testing by measuring levels of CREB and phosphorylated CREB (pCREB). The results revealed that hippocampal CREB levels in both strains of mice were not significantly altered according to the type of training (unpaired vs. paired). However, the hippocampal pCREB levels were significantly higher in the paired training group than the unpaired control group in C57BL/6 mice, but not in DBA/2 mice. These findings indicate that hippocampal pCREB is closely tied to this form of associative conditioning only in C57BL/6 mice and that different neural substrates may support trace conditioning in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 strains. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20501325      PMCID: PMC3219426          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  37 in total

1.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; T Abel; E R Kandel; R Bourtchouladze
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Strain and gender differences in the behavior of mouse lines commonly used in transgenic studies.

Authors:  V Võikar; S Kõks; E Vasar; H Rauvala
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-01

3.  Phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein in the mouse brain after fear conditioning: relationship to Fos production.

Authors:  M Stanciu; J Radulovic; J Spiess
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-19

Review 4.  Quantitative genetics and mouse behavior.

Authors:  J M Wehner; R A Radcliffe; B J Bowers
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: recent controversies and advances.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; G D Gale; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains: an analysis of the time course of memory.

Authors:  T Nie; T Abel
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Differential maintenance and frequency-dependent tuning of LTP at hippocampal synapses of specific strains of inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; S N Duffy; J Z Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Fear conditioning in C57/BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: variability in nucleus accumbens function according to the strain predisposition to show contextual- or cue-based responding.

Authors:  M Ammassari-Teule; E Passino; L Restivo; B de Marsanich
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Formation of temporal memory requires NMDA receptors within CA1 pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  P T Huerta; L D Sun; M A Wilson; S Tonegawa
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Viral-mediated expression of a constitutively active form of CREB in hippocampal neurons increases memory.

Authors:  Leonardo Restivo; Elisiana Tafi; Martine Ammassari-Teule; Hélène Marie
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the performance of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice in transitive inference and foreground and background contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Kristy A Cordero; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Genetic variability to diet-induced hippocampal dysfunction in BXD recombinant inbred (RI) mouse strains.

Authors:  Yueqiang Xue; JingJing Li; Lei Yan; Lu Lu; Francesca-Fang Liao
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Developing and validating trace fear conditioning protocols in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Cassandra A Simmons; Miles Hughes; Lei Lei
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Dysregulation of Npas4 and Inhba expression and an altered excitation-inhibition balance are associated with cognitive deficits in DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  Kristin Oberländer; Victoria Witte; Anne Stephanie Mallien; Peter Gass; C Peter Bengtson; Hilmar Bading
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Delay and trace fear conditioning in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: issues of measurement and performance.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Jonathan D Raybuck; Kari J Buck; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Pten haploinsufficiency causes desynchronized growth of brain areas involved in sensory processing.

Authors:  Amy E Clipperton-Allen; Hannah Swick; Valentina Botero; Massimiliano Aceti; Jacob Ellegood; Jason P Lerch; Damon T Page
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Differences in the Flexibility of Switching Learning Strategies and CREB Phosphorylation Levels in Prefrontal Cortex, Dorsal Striatum and Hippocampus in Two Inbred Strains of Mice.

Authors:  Woo-Hyun Cho; Jung-Soo Han
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.