Literature DB >> 12642766

Associations between back pain history and lumbar MRI findings.

Tapio Videman1, Michele C Battié, Laura E Gibbons, Kenneth Maravilla, Hannu Manninen, Jaakko Kaprio.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective monozygotic twin cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to investigate the associations between different spinal MRI findings and current, past year, and lifetime low back pain after adjusting for occupational physical loading, smoking, genetics, and early family influences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of spinal pathology in back symptoms continues to be controversial.
METHODS: The study participants consisted of 115 monozygotic male twin pairs 35 to 69 years of age. The qualitatively assessed MRI parameters were as follows: disc height, bulging, herniations, anular tears, osteophytes, spinal stenosis, and endplate changes. Signal intensity was measured quantitatively.
RESULTS: After controlling for age, disc height was associated with all back pain variables studied and anular tears with LBP frequency and intensity during the 12 months before imaging. Both were associated with lifetime frequency of low back pain interfering with daily activities, disability, and intensity of the worst lifetime pain episode. Other MRI findings did not explain the various symptom histories. Adjusting for physical loading in the past 12 months increased the associations of anular tears and "low back pain today" and 12-month low back pain parameters. After controlling for genotype and other familial influences, the within-pair differences in disc height and anular tears accounted for 6% to 12% of the total variance in the within-pair differences of low back pain variables.
CONCLUSION: These findings raise new questions about the underlying mechanisms of LBP. The sensitivities of the only significant MRI parameters, disc height narrowing and anular tears, are poor, and these findings alone are of limited clinical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642766     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049905.44466.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

1.  Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis--comparing two different image evaluation methods.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Oivind Gjertsen; Christian Hellum; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars G Johnsen; Geir E Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain.

Authors:  D Grob; H Frauenfelder; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Structural problems of the spine do not necessarily require intervention.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2007-03

4.  Nucleus pulposus deformation following application of mechanical diagnosis and therapy: a single case report with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki; Stephen May; Peter J Fazey; Toby Hall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-09

5.  T1rho and T2 relaxation times for lumbar disc degeneration: an in vivo comparative study at 3.0-Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; Feng Zhao; James F Griffith; Greta S P Mok; Jason C S Leung; Anil T Ahuja; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Ageing and degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables.

Authors:  Massimo Mariconda; Olimpio Galasso; Luigi Imbimbo; Giovanni Lotti; Carlo Milano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Eva Brosjö; Hans Billing; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.