Literature DB >> 12638745

The toxicity and fate of phenolic pollutants in the contaminated soils associated with the oil-shale industry.

Anne Kahru1, Alla Maloverjan, Helgi Sillak, Lee Põllumaa.   

Abstract

Phenol, cresols, dimethylphenols and resorcinols considered major pollutants in the oil-shale semi-coke dump leachates (up to 380 mg phenols/L) that contaminate the surrounding soils and pose a threat to the groundwater in the North-East of Estonia. However; despite high residual concentrations of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and oil products in these soils, the concentration of phenols (especially their water-extractable fraction) was low, not exceeding 0.7 mg/kg dwt. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of biodegradation and aging on the decrease of hazard caused by phenolic pollution. The extractability of phenols (phenol, cresols, dimethylphenols and resorcinols) and their biodegradability by the microbial population was studied in the 13 soils sampled from the Estonian oil-shale region, territories of former gas stations, and from presumably non-polluted areas. Phenol, 5-methylresorcinol, p-cresol and resorcinol could be considered easily degradable in the soils as the microbial populations from majority of the soils studied were able to grow on mineral medium supplemented with these phenols as a single source of carbon. 2,3- and 2,4- and 3,4-dimethylphenols could be considered less easily biodegradable. The semi-coke dump leachate polluted soil (containing no dibasic phenols, 43 mg of monobasic phenols, 1348 mg of oil products and 35 mg of PAHs per g dwt) was analyzed chemically (HPLC) and toxicologically (Flash-Assay using Vibrio fischeri) for the leaching of phenols during shaking of soil-water slurries for 24 h. Only 5.8% of the total concentration of phenols was water-extractable, whereas about 50% of the leached amount was biodegraded by the soil microorganisms. Phenol and cresols were biodegraded by 80%, but the concentration of dimethylphenols practically did not change. The pollutants (measured as total water-extractable toxicity) were desorbed from the soil particles by the 8th h of extraction, whereas the toxicity of the aqueous phase continued to increase, probably due to the formation of toxic metabolites. The concentration of water-extractable phenols was too low to explain the toxicity of the extract. Also the impact of PAHs and oil products was excluded. Thus, the relatively low concentration of phenols in the oil-shale region soils is most probably the reflection of both natural attenuation and pollution aging. Therefore, the impact of phenolic compounds to the net bioavailable hazard is probably not so remarkable as has been considered. The actual pollutants causing the soils from the oil-shale region, however, need to be elucidated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12638745     DOI: 10.1007/bf02987422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of biodegradation parameters of phenolic compounds on activated sludge by respirometry.

Authors:  K Orupõld; A Masirin; T Tenno
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Microbial toxicity of Cd and Hg in different soils related to total and water-soluble contents.

Authors:  G Welp; G W Brümmer
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Toxicological Investigation of Soils with the Solid-phase Flash Assay: Comparison with Other Ecotoxicological Tests.

Authors:  L Põllumaa; A Kahru; A Eisenträger; R Reiman; A Maloveryan; A Rätsep
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Toxicity of mono-, di- and tri-chlorophenols to lux marked terrestrial bacteria, Burkholderia species Rasc c2 and Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  E M Boyd; K Killham; A A Meharg
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Study of the environmental hazard caused by the oil shale industry solid waste.

Authors:  L Põllumaa; A Maloveryan; M Trapido; H Sillak; A Kahru
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  Predicting the Toxicity of Oil-shale Industry Wastewater by its Phenolic Composition.

Authors:  A Kahru; L Põllumaa; R Reiman; A Rätsep
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Acute aquatic toxicity of protolyzing substances studied as the microtox effect.

Authors:  A Svenson; L Zhang
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Biodegradation of creosote and pentachlorophenol in contaminated groundwater: chemical and biological assessment.

Authors:  J G Mueller; D P Middaugh; S E Lantz; P J Chapman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The efficiency of different phenol-degrading bacteria and activated sludges in detoxification of phenolic leachates.

Authors:  A Kahru; R Reiman; A Rätsep
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Role of chemical concentration and second carbon sources in acclimation of microbial communities for biodegradation.

Authors:  B A Wiggins; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Multi-omics Approaches To Decipher the Impact of Diet and Host Physiology on the Mammalian Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Christian Milani; Giulia Alessandri; Leonardo Mancabelli; Marta Mangifesta; Gabriele Andrea Lugli; Alice Viappiani; Giulia Longhi; Rosaria Anzalone; Sabrina Duranti; Francesca Turroni; Maria Cristina Ossiprandi; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Environmental effects of soil contamination by shale fuel oils.

Authors:  Liina Kanarbik; Irina Blinova; Mariliis Sihtmäe; Kai Künnis-Beres; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in ten commercial fish species along Tamilnadu coast, Bay of Bengal, India.

Authors:  S Veerasingam; R Venkatachalapathy; P Raja; S Sudhakar; V Rajeswari; R Mohamed Asanulla; R Mohan; P Sutharsan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Characterization of Opposing Responses to Phenol by Bacillus subtilis Chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Girija A Bodhankar; Payman Tohidifar; Zachary L Foust; George W Ordal; Christopher V Rao
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.476

5.  Biodegradation of phenolic mixtures in a sequencing batch reactor. A kinetic study.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Tomei; Maria Cristina Annesini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Potential Application of Algae in Biodegradation of Phenol: A Review and Bibliometric Study.

Authors:  Syahirah Batrisyia Mohamed Radziff; Siti Aqlima Ahmad; Noor Azmi Shaharuddin; Faradina Merican; Yih-Yih Kok; Azham Zulkharnain; Claudio Gomez-Fuentes; Chiew-Yen Wong
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06

7.  Packaging vertically aligned carbon nanotubes into a heat-shrink tubing for efficient removal of phenolic pollutants.

Authors:  Seung Min Moon; Hyegi Min; Sanghwan Park; Anar Zhexembekova; Jung Ki Suh; Chang Young Lee
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network.

Authors:  Panos Panagos; Marc Van Liedekerke; Yusuf Yigini; Luca Montanarella
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-06-16

9.  Delftia sp. LCW, a strain isolated from a constructed wetland shows novel properties for dimethylphenol isomers degradation.

Authors:  Mónica A Vásquez-Piñeros; Paula M Martínez-Lavanchy; Nico Jehmlich; Dietmar H Pieper; Carlos A Rincón; Hauke Harms; Howard Junca; Hermann J Heipieper
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.605

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.