Literature DB >> 18504836

Biodegradation of phenolic mixtures in a sequencing batch reactor. A kinetic study.

Maria Concetta Tomei1, Maria Cristina Annesini.   

Abstract

GOAL, SCOPE AND
BACKGROUND: In this study, attention was focused on substituted phenols because of their widespread presence in industrial effluents originating from many different sources: they are major constituents of wastewater from coal conversion processes, coke ovens, petroleum refineries and petrochemical industries, resin and fibreglass manufacturing and herbicide production. Moreover, for their characteristics of toxicity to humans and aquatic life (1 mgl(-1) is enough to detect the effects), they are included in the USEPA list of priority pollutants. Toxicity is higher in substituted phenols and is dependent on the nature and numbers of substituent groups. Objective of the present paper is to give a contribution to the modelling of phenolic mixture biodegradation by kinetic studies in which the different compounds are followed separately: this can be easily attained with an experimental apparatus such as the Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Two substituted phenols, 4-nitrophenol (4NP) and 3,4-dimethylphenol (3,4DMP), were utilized as substrates and their degradation kinetics were investigated to evaluate the process parameters both in single compound and in mixture tests.
METHODS: Single compound and mixture kinetic tests have been carried out during the reaction phase of the working cycle of the SBR reactor. The single substrates and their mixture were utilized as sole carbon and energy sources. Moreover, in order to verify data reproducibility, all kinetic tests have been carried out in at least two replicates under the same operating conditions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Kinetic data showed the presence of substrate inhibition, to model this experimental evidence the Haldane equation, that is usually employed for substrate inhibited kinetics, was rearranged in a different form with parameters which have a precise meaning in relation to the process kinetics and, at the same time, make the integration procedure easier. The derivation of the equation is shown in an Appendix at the end of the paper. Kinetic parameters obtained are suitable for application. It was observed that the 4-nitrophenol removal rate in single compound tests is significantly higher than the 3,4-dimethylphenol removal rate in the whole range of investigated concentrations (up to 80 mg COD l(-1)). A faster 4-nitrophenol biodegradation was also observed in mixture tests. Moreover, it is worth noting that the two compounds were simultaneously degraded and no diauxic growth was observed. The comparison between single compound and mixture degradation kinetics showed that the 4-nitrophenol degradation rate was comparable in the two cases while a significantly beneficial effect (by increase by about 80% of the maximum removal rate) was detected for 3,4-dimethylphenol degradation in the mixture.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study showed that the biodegradation kinetics of substituted phenols in mixture can be significantly different from that observed in single compound tests: in fact, the presence of a faster degradable compound (the 4NP) seems to exert a positive effect on the removal of a slower degradable compound (the 3,4DMP). The higher removal rate detected for 4NP, both in single compound and mixture tests, confirmed the key role of the biomass acclimatization in determining the biodegradation kinetics of xenobiotic compounds. The experimental approach and the original method applied for data analysis are of general validity and can be extended to the investigation of different classes of compounds. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: A relevant aspect related to the process applicability is the demonstrated possibility of easily adapting an enriched culture grown on a specific xenobiotic (in our case the 4NP) for the removal of similar single compounds or in mixtures. When biological process are considered for xenobiotic removal, this suggests a possible strategy of developing enriched cultures on target compounds that can be efficiently utilized on more complex matrices with reduced start up and acclimatization periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18504836     DOI: 10.1065/espr2007.12.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  Aerobic 4-nitrophenol degradation by microorganisms fixed in a continuously working aerated solid-bed reactor.

Authors:  P Ray; M Ait Oubelli; C Löser
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  4-nitrophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor operating with aerobic-anoxic cycles.

Authors:  M Concetta Tomei; M Cristina Annesini
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  P-nitrophenol degradation by activated sludge attached on nonwovens.

Authors:  Zafar Iqbal Bhatti; Haruko Toda; Kenji Furukawa
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 4.  Treatment of phenol and cresols in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process: a review.

Authors:  Gali S Veeresh; Pradeep Kumar; Indu Mehrotra
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Enhanced microbial adaptation to p-nitrophenol using activated sludge retained in porous carrier particles and simultaneous removal of nitrite released from degradation of p-nitrophenol.

Authors:  X H Xing; T Inoue; Y Tanji; H Unno
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Spatial and geographical variations of urban, suburban and rural atmospheric concentrations of phenols and nitrophenols.

Authors:  Stéphane Morville; Anne Scheyer; Philippe Mirabel; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Decolourization and removal of some organic compounds from olive mill wastewater by advanced oxidation processes and lime treatment.

Authors:  Mehmet Uğurlu; Ibrahim Kula
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Biodegradation of dimethylphenols by bacteria with different ring-cleavage pathways of phenolic compounds.

Authors:  Signe Viggor; Eeva Heinaru; Jyrki Loponen; Merike Merimaa; Toomas Tenno; Ain Heinaru
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  The toxicity and fate of phenolic pollutants in the contaminated soils associated with the oil-shale industry.

Authors:  Anne Kahru; Alla Maloverjan; Helgi Sillak; Lee Põllumaa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Kinetics of 4-nitrophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor.

Authors:  M Concetta Tomei; M Cristina Annesini; Roberta Luberti; Giorgia Cento; Alessandro Senia
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modelling the biodegradation kinetics of the herbicide propanil and its metabolite 3,4-dichloroaniline.

Authors:  Ricardo Marques; Adrian Oehmen; Gilda Carvalho; Maria A M Reis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Simultaneous oxidation of ammonium and cresol isomers in a sequencing batch reactor: physiological and kinetic study.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Salas-Cortés; Flor de María Cuervo-López; Anne-Claire Texier
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Extent of intracellular storage in single and dual substrate systems under pulse feeding.

Authors:  Asli S Ciggin; Simona Rossetti; Mauro Majone; Derin Orhon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Delftia sp. LCW, a strain isolated from a constructed wetland shows novel properties for dimethylphenol isomers degradation.

Authors:  Mónica A Vásquez-Piñeros; Paula M Martínez-Lavanchy; Nico Jehmlich; Dietmar H Pieper; Carlos A Rincón; Hauke Harms; Howard Junca; Hermann J Heipieper
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.605

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.