Literature DB >> 12638097

The effect of modifying patient-preferred spinal movement and alignment during symptom testing in patients with low back pain: a preliminary report.

Linda R Van Dillen1, Shirley A Sahrmann, Barbara J Norton, Cheryl A Caldwell, Mary Kate McDonnell, Nancy Bloom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect on symptoms of modifying patient-preferred movements and alignments of the lumbar spine during patient examination.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures study in which patients with low back pain (LBP) participated in a standardized examination that included tests of symptoms with various movements and positions.
SETTING: Six university-affiliated outpatient physical therapy clinics and the local community. PARTICIPANTS: Five trained physical therapists examined a total of 185 patients (102 women, 83 men; mean age, 41.89+/-13.29 y) with LBP. The majority of patients had multiepisode, chronic LBP.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The examination included tests of symptoms with various alignments and movements in several different positions. Seven tests were designated as primary tests. Tests that increased symptoms were followed immediately by a secondary test in which (1) patient-preferred lumbar spine movement was modified or (2) the lumbar spine was positioned in a neutral alignment. Patients reported the effect of the secondary test on symptoms relative to their symptoms with the primary test. Three responses were possible: symptoms increased, remained the same, or decreased.
RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of the patients reported an increase in symptoms with 1 or more of the 7 primary tests. Ninety-five percent who reported an increase in symptoms with at least 1 of the primary tests reported a decrease in symptoms with 1 or more of the 7 secondary tests. The majority of patients reported a decrease in symptoms when the spinal movement or alignment was modified for 6 of the 7 secondary tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the symptom-provoking movements and alignments of the spine during symptom testing resulted in a decrease in symptoms for the majority of patients. Information about specific modifications that provide relief of LBP symptoms is important because it can be used to design a treatment program that focuses on training a patient to modify the same movements and alignments in their everyday activities. Copyright 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12638097     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  34 in total

1.  Association between rotation-related impairments and activity type in people with and without low back pain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Weyrauch; Sara C Bohall; Christopher J Sorensen; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing?

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Barbara J Norton; Jack P Callaghan; Ching-Ting Hwang; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-01-14

3.  The effect of within-session instruction on lumbopelvic motion during a lower limb movement in people with and people without low back pain.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Barbara J Norton; Catherine E Lang; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-06-02

4.  Asymmetry of lumbopelvic movement patterns during active hip abduction is a risk factor for low back pain development during standing.

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Molly B Johnson; Barbara J Norton; Jack P Callaghan; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Sex differences in lumbopelvic movement patterns during hip medial rotation in people with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Shannon L Hoffman; Molly B Johnson; Dequan Zou; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Examination of the Lumbar Movement Pattern during a Clinical Test and a Functional Activity Test in People with and without Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Andrej V Marich; Ching-Ting Hwang; Christopher J Sorensen; Linda R van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The Role of Decreased Hip IR as a Cause of Low Back Pain in a Golfer: a Case Report.

Authors:  Gregory Reinhardt
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-24

10.  Low Back Pain Response to Pelvic Tilt Position: An Observational Study of Chiropractic Patients.

Authors:  Salvatore J Minicozzi; Brent S Russell; Kathryn J Ray; Alessandria Y Struebing; Edward F Owens
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.