Literature DB >> 12632279

[Epidemiology, treatment and results of proximal humeral fractures: experience of a district hospital in a sports- and tourism area].

J Sonderegger1, H-P Simmen.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The epidemiology, therapy and results of proximal humeral fractures in a touristic area were investigated and our concept for treatment presented.
METHODS: Between 1.1.1999 and 30.04.2000 adult patients with proximal humeral fractures were included, the fractures classified (Codman/Neer and AO) and results determined after an average of 9 months.
RESULTS: 62 adults were treated. 59 (95 %) had an accident during leisure time, mainly skiing accidents (52 %). 7 patients (11 %) had an associated luxation of the shoulder. 51 (82 %) were treated conservatively, 11 (18 %) operatively with a T-plate. The conservatively treated had to wear a Gilchrist-cast for an average of 29 (operatively 13) days, started passive movement after 20 (operatively 9) days, and active movement after 44 (operatively 45) days. The 32 employed (52 %) were not able to work for 46 days on average. Overall, 52 patients (84 %) were totally or mostly satisfied with the result. 5 among the 13 patients (38.5 %) with 3- or 4-part-fractures, and 4 among the 11 operated patients (36.4 %) were not satisfied with the result.
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal humeral fractures are common skiing injuries, they need a long and intensive treatment and are economically expensive. The Codman/Neer and AO-classifications are equal. The results for simple, mainly conservatively treated fractures (Codman/Neer 1, 2A, 2-part) are good. Complex, mainly operatively treated fractures (Codman/Neer 3- and 4-part) have a much poorer prognosis. Diagnostically the computed tomography with 3-D-reconstruction is recommended for a better representation of the fracture and a safer choice of the therapeutical strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632279     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  3 in total

1.  Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Tanja Stojicevic; Stojicevic Tanja; Gunnar Blumenstock; Blumenstock Gunnar; Stig Brorson; Brorson Stig; Andreas Badke; Ulrich Stöckle; Stöckle Ulrich; Bernd Rolauffs; Rolauffs Bernd; Thomas Freude; Freude Thomas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome after operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Markus Muhm; Julia Bott; Christoph Lahr; Hartmut Winkler; Thomas Ruffing
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Is locking nailing of humeral head fractures superior to locking plate fixation?

Authors:  G Gradl; A Dietze; M Kääb; W Hopfenmüller; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.