Literature DB >> 26419482

Outcome after operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Markus Muhm1,2, Julia Bott3, Christoph Lahr4, Hartmut Winkler4,5, Thomas Ruffing4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proximal humeral fracture (PHF) (5 %) of the elderly is the third most common fracture after proximal femoral and distal radius fractures. Proximal femoral fractures often lead to a loss of autonomy.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to show how PHF changes the patient's autonomy and the coping with everyday life as well as which factors influence the outcome 1 year (y) after surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 62 patients with surgical treatment of a PHF ≥ 60 y was prospectively collected. With a telephone interview Short Form (SF) 12 (physical and mental health; PH, MH), Barthel Index (BI), range of motion, pain, and satisfaction was observed after 3 and 12 months. The dependence of outcome on different factors was investigated.
RESULTS: The mean age was 73.3 y (median 73, 60-94). Mortality after 3 months was 3 % and after 1 y 11 %. The PH before the injury (47.9) was significantly better than after 3 months (37.1) and after 1 y (42.6). The MH showed no difference. The BI before the injury (92) was significantly better than after 3 months (86), but the same after 1 y (91). After 1 y > 50 % were able to abduct and flex the arm > 90°. More than two-thirds were able to perform everyday life activities for body care and nutrition after 1 y. Approximately, 73 % of the patients had little or no pain, and 84 % were satisfied with the result after 1 y. Good score values before the fracture resulted in better outcome. Higher severity in fracture led to a higher level of pain. DISCUSSION: A surgically treated PHF in the elderly does not lead to a relevant impairment in quality of life. Despite the lack of complete retrieval of range of motion patients achieve a good to very good result in coping with everyday life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coping with everyday life; Outcome; Proximal humeral fracture; Quality of life; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26419482     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-015-0954-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  24 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; A Garg; M M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-08

5.  [Do injuries of the upper extremity in geriatric patients end up in helplessness? A prospective study for the outcome of distal radius and proximal humerus fractures in individuals over 65].

Authors:  T Einsiedel; C Becker; D Stengel; A Schmelz; M Kramer; M Däxle; F Lechner; L Kinzl; F Gebhard
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Ralph Hertel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Lanting; Joy MacDermid; Darren Drosdowech; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  [Primary hemiarthroplasty after complex fracture of the humeral head--functional late results].

Authors:  E Kollig; F Kutscha-Lissberg; B Roetman; E Mielke; G Muhr; M P Hahn
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  [Epidemiology, treatment and results of proximal humeral fractures: experience of a district hospital in a sports- and tourism area].

Authors:  J Sonderegger; H-P Simmen
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.942

10.  Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.

Authors:  J J van der Putten; J C Hobart; J A Freeman; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.