Literature DB >> 12632250

Stimuli produced by observing responses make rats' ethanol self-administration more resistant to price increases.

Timothy A Shahan1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Observing responses bring sensory receptors into contact with environmental stimuli. In the observing-response procedure, periods in which an operant response (e.g. pressing a lever) is reinforced by drug deliveries alternate with periods in which this response is never reinforced (i.e. extinction). These alternating periods of drug availability versus extinction are not signaled. Observing responses (i.e. presses on a second lever) produce brief stimuli signaling whether drug is available or not for responses on the first lever. Little is known about how parameters of the drug reinforcer affect drug-stimulus observing.
OBJECTIVES: The effects of changes in the unit price (responses/reinforcer magnitude) of self-administered ethanol on rats' observing were examined. Also, the effects of an observing-response-produced ethanol stimulus on ethanol consumption were examined by comparing consumption during signaled and unsignaled periods of ethanol availability.
METHODS: Rats self-administered oral ethanol in the observing-response procedure. The unit price of ethanol in the observing-response procedure was increased by increasing the response requirement for ethanol across conditions.
RESULTS: Observing and response rates on the ethanol lever increased and then decreased with increases in the unit price of ethanol. However, ethanol-lever responding and ethanol consumption during periods when ethanol was available were less sensitive to increases in price when the observing-response-produced ethanol stimulus was present.
CONCLUSIONS: Observing varies as an orderly function of unit price of a drug reinforcer, and drug stimuli produced by observing responses can make drug consumption less sensitive to increases in price. This procedure may provide an animal model of both attending to drug stimuli and the resultant effects of these stimuli on drug taking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632250     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1390-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  35 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Effects of compounding drug-related stimuli: escalation of heroin self-administration.

Authors:  L V Panlilio; S J Weiss; C W Schindler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers.

Authors:  J M Townshend; T Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Reinstatement of ethanol seeking in rats: behavioral analysis.

Authors:  P Bienkowski; E Koros; W Kostowski; A Bogucka-Bonikowska
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminative conditioning; effects of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response.

Authors:  W K ESTES
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-04

8.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants.

Authors:  J Stewart; H de Wit; R Eikelboom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence.

Authors:  D I Lubman; L A Peters; K Mogg; B P Bradley; J F Deakin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  4 in total

1.  The resistance to change of observing.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Adam Magee; Andria Dobberstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Perhaps More Consideration of Pavlovian-Operant Interaction May Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Behaviorally Based Drug Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013

4.  On the nature of directed behavior to drug-associated light cues in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Sonja I Berndt; James H Woods
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.