Literature DB >> 12632114

Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device.

R Stendel1, J Heidenreich, A Schilling, R Akhavan-Sigari, R Kurth, T Picht, T Pietilä, O Suess, C Kern, J Meisel, M Brock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) still plays a key role in the management of patients at risk from intracranial hypertension. Numerous ICP-measuring devices are available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility of the recently developed Neurovent-P(REHAU AG+CO, REHAU, Germany) ICP monitoring device.
METHOD: In a prospective two-center study, a total of 98 patients with severe head injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, and non-traumatic brain edema underwent intraparenchymal monitoring of ICP using the Neurovent-P. A control group comprising 50 patients underwent implantation of the Camino-OLM-110-4B ICP monitor. The zero drift of the probes was determined before and after the ICP recording period. Technical and medical complications were documented. The MRI compatibility of the Neurovent-P ICP probe was investigated by evaluating artifacts caused by the probe, probe function and temperature changes during MRI, and probe movement caused by the magnetic field.
FINDINGS: The mean zero drift was 0.2+/-0.41 mmHg (maximum 3 mmHg) for the Neurovent-P ICP probes and 0.4+/-0.57 mmHg (maximum 12 mmHg) for the Camino-OLM-110-4B ICP probes. No significant correlation was identified between the extent of zero drift following the removal of the probes and the length of monitoring. Intraparenchymal haemorrhage spatially related to the probe occurred in 1 out of 50 (2%) patients with a Camino-OLM-110-4B probe and in 1 out of 98 (1%) with a Neurovent-P. Damage of the probe due to kinking or overextension of the cable or glass fiber occurred in 4 of the 50 (8%) Camino-OLM-110-4B ICP probes and in 5 of the 98 (5%) Neurovent-P probes. On T2-weighted MR images, the Neurovent-P ICP probe induced only small artifacts with very good discrimination of the surrounding tissue. On T1-weighted MR images, there was a good imaging quality but artifact-related local disturbances in signal occurred. There was no temperature change in the Neurovent-P probe and in the surrounding brain tissue during MR imaging.
INTERPRETATION: The Neurovent-P ICP measuring system is a safe and reliable tool for ICP monitoring. Handling of the Neurovent-P system is safe when performed properly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632114     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-1052-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of MR imaging compatibility of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device.

Authors:  Jens O Heidenreich; Rüdiger Stendel; Mario Brock; Karl-Jürgen Wolf; Andreas M Schilling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Neuromonitoring in the intensive care unit. I. Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow monitoring.

Authors:  Anuj Bhatia; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The baseline pressure of intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors can be altered by electrostatic discharges.

Authors:  Per K Eide; André Bakken
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review.

Authors:  P H Raboel; J Bartek; M Andresen; B M Bellander; B Romner
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 5.  Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zacchetti; Sandra Magnoni; Federica Di Corte; Elisa R Zanier; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Evaluation of a New Multiparameter Brain Probe for Simultaneous Measurement of Brain Tissue Oxygenation, Cerebral Blood Flow, Intracranial Pressure, and Brain Temperature in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Marius M Mader; Anna Leidorf; Andreas Hecker; Axel Heimann; Petra S M Mayr; Oliver Kempski; Beat Alessandri; Gabriele Wöbker
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-05-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.