Literature DB >> 12631604

Twenty-year results of the Naples GUN randomized trial: predictive factors of adjuvant tamoxifen efficacy in early breast cancer.

Sabino De Placido1, Michelino De Laurentiis, Chiara Carlomagno, Ciro Gallo, Franco Perrone, Stefano Pepe, Angela Ruggiero, Alfredo Marinelli, Clorindo Pagliarulo, Luigi Panico, Guido Pettinato, Giuseppe Petrella, Angelo Raffaele Bianco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen (TAM) is increasingly administered to new early breast cancer patients. Because it is not devoid of toxic effects, we studied factors potentially predictive of its efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: From 1978 to 1983, 433 patients were enrolled in the GUN randomized trial: 206 were assigned to TAM versus 227 controls (no-TAM). Premenopausal patients with axillary lymph node involvement (60 TAM versus 65 no-TAM) also received nine CMF cycles. Eight biological markers were retrospectively assayed for most patients: estrogen; progesterone; prolactin receptors (PrlRs); microvessel count (MVC); S-phase fraction; tumor ploidy; epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); and HER2. We performed a multivariate test of the TAM/covariate interactions to establish whether these variables predicted for TAM efficacy. Estimates of the TAM effect were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) of death of TAM over no-TAM patients with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15 years, PrlRs, MVC, S-phase fraction, ploidy, and EGFR did not influence TAM efficacy. Differently, HER2 had an overall significant predictive effect: HR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40-0.87) in HER2-negative subjects versus HR = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.63-1.87) in HER2-positive subjects (interaction test: P = 0.04). The predictive effect of HER2 was also evident in the subgroup of patients with steroid receptor-positive tumors (HER2 positive: HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.70-2.51; HER2 negative: HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.47-1.14).
CONCLUSIONS: With the statistical power of the present randomized trial, S-phase, ploidy, EGFR, PrlR, and MVC do not seem to predict for TAM efficacy. Conversely, our data support the hypothesis that tumors overexpressing HER2 might not benefit from adjuvant TAM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12631604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

Review 1.  Utilizing prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Deepa S Subramaniam; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

2.  Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chungyeul Kim; Gong Tang; Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Joseph P Costantino; Frederick L Baehner; Joffre Baker; Maureen T Cronin; Drew Watson; Steven Shak; Olga L Bohn; Debora Fumagalli; Yusuke Taniyama; Ahwon Lee; Megan L Reilly; Victor G Vogel; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomised premenopausal breast cancer trial.

Authors:  K Jirström; L Rydén; L Anagnostaki; B Nordenskjöld; O Stål; S Thorstenson; G Chebil; P-E Jönsson; M Fernö; G Landberg
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Fibroblast Subtypes Regulate Responsiveness of Luminal Breast Cancer to Estrogen.

Authors:  Heather M Brechbuhl; Jessica Finlay-Schultz; Tomomi M Yamamoto; Austin E Gillen; Diana M Cittelly; Aik-Choon Tan; Sharon B Sams; Manoj M Pillai; Anthony D Elias; William A Robinson; Carol A Sartorius; Peter Kabos
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Prospective multi-centre study to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in specimens from adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sabine Riethdorf; Bernhard Hoegel; Birgit John; German Ott; Peter Fritz; Susanne Thon; Thomas Loening; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  SMAD4 expression in breast ductal carcinoma correlates with prognosis.

Authors:  Nannan Liu; Chunyan Yu; Yanfen Shi; Jing Jiang; Yuhe Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Trastuzumab and breast cancer: developments and current status.

Authors:  Eriko Tokunaga; Eiji Oki; Kojiro Nishida; Tadashi Koga; Akinori Egashira; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Monoclonal antibody-based targeted therapy in breast cancer: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Chantal Bernard-Marty; Fabienne Lebrun; Ahmad Awada; Martine J Piccart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Clinical significance of the quantitative assessment of the cytosolic concentration of HER-2/neu protein in breast cancer by immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA).

Authors:  Maria D Corte; Juan A Rodil; Julio Vázquez; Lucia García; Juan C Rodríguez; Miguel Bongera; José C Fernández; Luis O González; Ma Luz Lamelas; Maite Allende; José L García-Muñiz; Antonio Fueyo; Francisco J Vizoso
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  An updated review on the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  S Verma; S Sehdev; A Joy; Y Madarnas; J Younus; J A Roy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.