Literature DB >> 27702820

Fibroblast Subtypes Regulate Responsiveness of Luminal Breast Cancer to Estrogen.

Heather M Brechbuhl1, Jessica Finlay-Schultz2, Tomomi M Yamamoto3, Austin E Gillen3, Diana M Cittelly2, Aik-Choon Tan3, Sharon B Sams2, Manoj M Pillai4, Anthony D Elias3, William A Robinson3, Carol A Sartorius2, Peter Kabos1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Antiendocrine therapy remains the most effective treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, but development of resistance is a major clinical complication. Effective targeting of mechanisms that control the loss of ER dependency in breast cancer remains elusive. We analyzed breast cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), the largest component of the tumor microenvironment, as a factor contributing to ER expression levels and antiendocrine resistance.Experimental Design: Tissues from patients with ER+ breast cancer were analyzed for the presence of CD146-positive (CD146pos) and CD146-negative (CD146neg) fibroblasts. ER-dependent proliferation and tamoxifen sensitivity were evaluated in ER+ tumor cells cocultured with CD146pos or CD146neg fibroblasts. RNA sequencing was used to develop a high-confidence gene signature that predicts for disease recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients with ER+ breast cancer.
Results: We demonstrate that ER+ breast cancers contain two CAF subtypes defined by CD146 expression. CD146neg CAFs suppress ER expression in ER+ breast cancer cells, decrease tumor cell sensitivity to estrogen, and increase tumor cell resistance to tamoxifen therapy. Conversely, the presence of CD146pos CAFs maintains ER expression in ER+ breast cancer cells and sustains estrogen-dependent proliferation and sensitivity to tamoxifen. Conditioned media from CD146pos CAFs with tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells are sufficient to restore tamoxifen sensitivity. Gene expression profiles of patient breast tumors with predominantly CD146neg CAFs correlate with inferior clinical response to tamoxifen and worse patient outcomes.Conclusions: Our data suggest that CAF composition contributes to treatment response and patient outcomes in ER+ breast cancer and should be considered a target for drug development. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1710-21. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27702820      PMCID: PMC5378660          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  53 in total

1.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance.

Authors:  Alistair Ring; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A kinome-wide screen identifies the insulin/IGF-I receptor pathway as a mechanism of escape from hormone dependence in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emily M Fox; Todd W Miller; Justin M Balko; Maria G Kuba; Violeta Sánchez; R Adam Smith; Shuying Liu; Ana María González-Angulo; Gordon B Mills; Fei Ye; Yu Shyr; H Charles Manning; Elizabeth Buck; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Enhancing Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Cotargeting Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Stephen R D Johnston
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Nicholas Bertos; Francois Pepin; Svetlana Sadekova; Margarita Souleimanova; Hong Zhao; Haiying Chen; Gulbeyaz Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  A molecular model for the mechanism of acquired tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ping Fan; Fadeke A Agboke; Heather E Cunliffe; Pilar Ramos; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells into prostate tumours promotes metastasis.

Authors:  Younghun Jung; Jin Koo Kim; Yusuke Shiozawa; Jingcheng Wang; Anjali Mishra; Jeena Joseph; Janice E Berry; Samantha McGee; Eunsohl Lee; Hongli Sun; Jianhua Wang; Taocong Jin; Honglai Zhang; Jinlu Dai; Paul H Krebsbach; Evan T Keller; Kenneth J Pienta; Russell S Taichman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Elevated CXCL1 expression in breast cancer stroma predicts poor prognosis and is inversely associated with expression of TGF-β signaling proteins.

Authors:  An Zou; Diana Lambert; Henry Yeh; Ken Yasukawa; Fariba Behbod; Fang Fan; Nikki Cheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Differential gene expression in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells revealed by a new analytical model of RNA-Seq data.

Authors:  Kathryn J Huber-Keener; Xiuping Liu; Zhong Wang; Yaqun Wang; Willard Freeman; Song Wu; Maricarmen D Planas-Silva; Xingcong Ren; Yan Cheng; Yi Zhang; Kent Vrana; Chang-Gong Liu; Jin-Ming Yang; Rongling Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  70 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Governing the Transcriptional Regulation of ESR1.

Authors:  David K Lung; Rebecca M Reese; Elaine T Alarid
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 2.  Modeling chemical effects on breast cancer: the importance of the microenvironment in vitro.

Authors:  Molly M Morgan; Linda A Schuler; Jordan C Ciciliano; Brian P Johnson; Elaine T Alarid; David J Beebe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Identification of a novel therapeutic candidate, NRK, in primary cancer-associated fibroblasts of lung adenocarcinoma microenvironment.

Authors:  Tongtong Wei; Jinjing Song; Kai Liang; Li Li; Xiaoxiang Mo; Zhiguang Huang; Gang Chen; Naiquan Mao; Jie Yang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Tumor microenvironment promotes breast cancer chemoresistance.

Authors:  Umar Mehraj; Abid Hamid Dar; Nissar A Wani; Manzoor A Mir
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  IL-1 induces p62/SQSTM1 and autophagy in ERα+ /PR+ BCa cell lines concomitant with ERα and PR repression, conferring an ERα- /PR- BCa-like phenotype.

Authors:  Afshan Fathima Nawas; Ragini Mistry; Shrinath Narayanan; Shayna Elizabeth Thomas-Jardin; Janani Ramachandran; Jananisree Ravichandran; Ebin Neduvelil; Krisha Luangpanh; Nikki Ayanna Delk
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Modulation of redox metabolism negates cancer-associated fibroblasts-induced treatment resistance in a heterotypic 3D culture platform of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mans Broekgaarden; Sriram Anbil; Anne-Laure Bulin; Girgis Obaid; Zhiming Mai; Yan Baglo; Imran Rizvi; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Fibroblast subtypes define a metastatic matrisome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Heather M Brechbuhl; Alexander S Barrett; Etana Kopin; Jaime C Hagen; Amy L Han; Austin E Gillen; Jessica Finlay-Schultz; Diana M Cittelly; Philip Owens; Kathryn B Horwitz; Carol A Sartorius; Kirk Hansen; Peter Kabos
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-02-27

8.  Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Transcriptionally Repress ESR1 but Cannot Overcome Constitutive ESR1 Mutant Activity.

Authors:  David K Lung; Jay W Warrick; Peiman Hematti; Natalie S Callander; Christina J Mark; Shigeki Miyamoto; Elaine T Alarid
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Stromal cell diversity associated with immune evasion in human triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunny Z Wu; Daniel L Roden; Chenfei Wang; Holly Holliday; Kate Harvey; Aurélie S Cazet; Kendelle J Murphy; Brooke Pereira; Ghamdan Al-Eryani; Nenad Bartonicek; Rui Hou; James R Torpy; Simon Junankar; Chia-Ling Chan; Chuan En Lam; Mun N Hui; Laurence Gluch; Jane Beith; Andrew Parker; Elizabeth Robbins; Davendra Segara; Cindy Mak; Caroline Cooper; Sanjay Warrier; Alistair Forrest; Joseph Powell; Sandra O'Toole; Thomas R Cox; Paul Timpson; Elgene Lim; X Shirley Liu; Alexander Swarbrick
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Breaking through to the Other Side: Microenvironment Contributions to DCIS Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Andrew C Nelson; Heather L Machado; Kathryn L Schwertfeger
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.