Literature DB >> 12630979

Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: calculating benefit and harm in the individual patient.

Yoon Kong Loke1, Alastair Bell, Sheena Derry.   

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the absolute reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events and absolute increase in gastrointestinal haemorrhage associated with aspirin for individuals with different baseline risks.
METHODS: Calculation of absolute treatment effects from estimates of: (i) baseline risks for cardiovascular event and gastrointestinal haemorrhage; and (ii) relative risks of these events with treatment. Baseline cardiovascular risks were derived from existing risk scores, and baseline risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage from an observational cohort study. Changes in relative risks were obtained from clinical trial data. The effects of aspirin treatment were calculated in examples of two individuals with very different baseline risks.
RESULTS: Treatment of a healthy 74-year-old man (blood pressure 144/88 mm Hg and no history of gastrointestinal disorder) would reduce his annual risk of a cardiovascular event from 2% to 1.74% (absolute risk reduction 0.26%, number needed to treat 385), but increase the gastrointestinal haemorrhage risk from 0.3% to 0.51% (absolute risk increase 0.21%, number needed to harm 476). In a 66-year-old obese man, following a transient ischaemic attack, and with a history of hospital treatment for a peptic ulcer, the annual risk of a cardiovascular event would be reduced from 5% to 4.35% (absolute risk reduction 0.65%, number needed to treat 153), but the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage would increase from 1.08% to 1.83% (absolute risk increase 0.75%, number needed to harm 133).
CONCLUSIONS: Estimating benefit and harm by taking into account the baseline risks in each individual allows patients and doctors to judge for themselves the magnitude of the trade-offs involved in taking aspirin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630979      PMCID: PMC1884222          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01774.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  14 in total

1.  Using the Framingham model to predict heart disease in the United Kingdom: retrospective study.

Authors:  S Ramachandran; J M French; M P Vanderpump; P Croft; R H Neary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

2.  Cumulative meta-analysis of aspirin efficacy after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin.

Authors:  A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men.

Authors:  I U Haq; L E Ramsay; W W Yeo; P R Jackson; E J Wallis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  A Lanas; E Bajador; P Serrano; J Fuentes; S Carreño; J Guardia; M Sanz; M Montoro; R Sáinz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing.

Authors:  A D Hingorani; P Vallance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-09

6.  Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; D R Anderson; M J Gardner; W Putnam; G J Flowerdew; B F Brownell; S Nagpal; J L Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

7.  Aspirin at any dose above 30 mg offers only modest protection after cerebral ischaemia.

Authors:  A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Derry; Y K Loke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-11

9.  Aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: safety and absolute benefit related to coronary risk derived from meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  P S Sanmuganathan; P Ghahramani; P R Jackson; E J Wallis; L E Ramsay
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  An evidence based approach to individualising treatment.

Authors:  P P Glasziou; L M Irwig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the benefit-harm balance at the bedside.

Authors:  Yoon Kong Loke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

2.  American, British and European recommendations for statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease applied to British men studied prospectively.

Authors:  P McElduff; M Jaefarnezhad; P N Durrington
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.994

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.