Literature DB >> 11179262

Aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: safety and absolute benefit related to coronary risk derived from meta-analysis of randomised trials.

P S Sanmuganathan1, P Ghahramani, P R Jackson, E J Wallis, L E Ramsay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cardiovascular and coronary risk thresholds at which aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease is safe and worthwhile.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials of aspirin for primary prevention. The benefit and harm from aspirin treatment were examined to determine: (1) the cardiovascular and coronary risk threshold at which benefit in prevention of myocardial infarction exceeds harm from significant bleeding; and (2) the absolute benefit expressed as number needed to treat (NNT) for aspirin net of cerebral haemorrhage and other bleeding complications at different levels of coronary risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Benefit from aspirin, expressed as reduction in cardiovascular events, myocardial infarctions, strokes, and total mortality; harm caused by aspirin in relation to significant bleeds and major haemorrhages.
RESULTS: Aspirin for primary prevention significantly reduced all cardiovascular events by 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 22%) and myocardial infarctions by 30% (95% CI 21% to 38%), and non-significantly reduced all deaths by 6% (95% CI -4% to 15%). Aspirin non-significantly increased strokes by 6% (95% CI -24% to 9%) and significantly increased bleeding complications by 69% (95% CI 38% to 107%). The risk of major bleeding balanced the reduction in cardiovascular events when cardiovascular event risk was 0.22%/year. The upper 95% CI for this estimate suggests that harm from aspirin is unlikely to outweigh benefit provided the cardiovascular event risk is 0.8%/year, equivalent to a coronary risk of 0.6%/year. At coronary event risk 1.5%/year, the five year NNT was 44 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 77 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of any important bleeding complication. At coronary event risk 1%/year the NNT was 67 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 182 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of important bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin treatment for primary prevention is safe and worthwhile at coronary event risk >/= 1.5%/year; safe but of limited value at coronary risk 1%/year; and unsafe at coronary event risk 0.5%/year. Advice on aspirin for primary prevention requires formal accurate estimation of absolute coronary event risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11179262      PMCID: PMC1729640          DOI: 10.1136/heart.85.3.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  17 in total

1.  Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention: validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population.

Authors:  E J Wallis; L E Ramsay; I Ul Haq; P Ghahramani; P R Jackson; K Rowland-Yeo; W W Yeo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

2.  Risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding with aspirin.

Authors:  C Isles; J Norrie; J Paterson; L Ritchie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Influence of gender and age on preventing cardiovascular disease by antihypertensive treatment and acetylsalicylic acid. The HOT study. Hypertension Optimal Treatment.

Authors:  S E Kjeldsen; R E Kolloch; G Leonetti; J M Mallion; A Zanchetti; D Elmfeldt; I Warnold; L Hansson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Prediction of coronary risk for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  I U Haq; L E Ramsay; P R Jackson; E J Wallis
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1999-07

5.  Determination of who may derive most benefit from aspirin in primary prevention: subgroup results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  T W Meade; P J Brennan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

6.  British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; B Williams; G D Johnston; G A MacGregor; L Poston; J F Potter; N R Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04

7.  Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  J Weil; D Colin-Jones; M Langman; D Lawson; R Logan; M Murphy; M Rawlins; M Vessey; P Wainwright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-01

8.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study.

Authors:  S A Grover; I Lowensteyn; K L Esrey; Y Steinert; L Joseph; M Abrahamowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

10.  Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors.

Authors:  R Peto; R Gray; R Collins; K Wheatley; C Hennekens; K Jamrozik; C Warlow; B Hafner; E Thompson; S Norton
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-30
View more
  71 in total

1.  Effects of pretreatment with verapamil on early recurrences after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomised study.

Authors:  E Bertaglia; D D'Este; A Zanocco; F Zerbo; P Pascotto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Acute pressure overload cardiac arrhythmias are dependent on the presence of myocardial tissue catecholamines.

Authors:  A J Drake-Holland; M I Noble; M J Lab
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Docetaxel induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  M Shimoyama; Y Murata; K I Sumi; R Hamazoe; I Komuro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Strong prognostic value of combining N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide and ECG to predict death in heart patients from general practice.

Authors:  O W Nielsen; J Hilden; J F Hansen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Implementation of the NICE guidelines for the primary prevention of mortality from ventricular tachyarrhythmias: implications for UK electrophysiology centres; activity modelling from the UK-HEART study.

Authors:  N P Gall; M T Kearney; A Zaman; S O'Nunain; K A Fox; A Flapan; J Nolan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Renin angiotensin system inhibition is associated with reduced free radical concentrations in arteries of patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  C Berry; N Anderson; A J Kirk; A F Dominiczak; J J McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Dissolution of tungsten coils leads to device failure after transcatheter embolisation of pathologic vessels.

Authors:  M Peuster; V Kaese; G Wuensch; P Wuebbolt; M Niemeyer; R Boekenkamp; C Fink; H Haferkamp; G Hausdorf
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Progressive ECG changes before the onset of atrial flutter in adult congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  W Li; H B Xiao; M Y Henein; J Somerville; D G Gibson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Altered CD18 leucocyte integrin expression and adhesive function in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  G S Hillis; W C Dalsey; C A Terregino; I Daskal; A Nangione
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Do cyclooxygenase inhibitors increase risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events?

Authors:  Brent Kvern
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.