Literature DB >> 19568856

Effects of educational intervention on joint angles of the trunk and lower extremity and on muscle activities during patient-handling tasks.

Toru Akebi1, Masaiwa Inoue, Noriaki Harada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of educational intervention on joint angles of the trunk and lower extremity and on muscle activities during patient-handling task.
METHODS: Thirty-two subjects (17 males and 15 females) volunteered for the study. They were classified into three groups: intervention group 1, comprised of first grade physical therapist students; control group, which included first grade occupational therapist students; intervention group 2, which comprised third grade physical therapist students. The educational intervention during the experimental period consisted of: (1) 12 regular classes and short-term clinical practice for the students of intervention group 1; (2) long-term clinical practice, relating to patient-handling task, for the students of intervention group 2. The following experiments were repeated before and after the educational intervention. Each subject was asked to transfer a male (55 kg) from one chair to a second chair (left to right) and then back again to the original chair (right to left). The flexion angles of the trunk, hip and knee joints were quantified by means of the dynamic three-dimensional biomechanical analysis. Muscle activities (% maximum voluntary contraction, %MVC) of biceps brachii, trapezius, rectus femoris and erector spinae muscles were measured using surface electromyography (EMG). The effects of group, gender, measurement time and side on joint angles of trunk and lower extremity, %MVC of four muscle activities and transfer time were assessed.
RESULTS: Although the EMG analysis could not clearly demonstrate any reduction of physical load to the low back, the flexion angles of the hip and knee joints of student subjects during the patient-handling task became larger and that of the trunk became smaller in the group given the educational intervention.
CONCLUSION: The finding of this study suggests that the posture of the study subjects changed to the squat lifting method, which is preferable for reducing the physical load to the lower back, as a result of the educational intervention.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19568856      PMCID: PMC2684777          DOI: 10.1007/s12199-008-0067-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med        ISSN: 1342-078X            Impact factor:   3.674


  26 in total

1.  Interventions to reduce back pain in rehabilitation hospital nursing staff.

Authors:  Nancy N Menzel; Scarlett Lilley; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.625

Review 2.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; G Sorock
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  The prevalence and cause of occupational back pain in Hong Kong registered nurses.

Authors:  P French; L F Flora; L S Ping; L K Bo; W H Rita
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  Epidemiological aspects of back pain within the nursing profession.

Authors:  P Buckle
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Back pain in the nursing profession. I. Epidemiology and pilot methodology.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; P W Buckle; M P Hudson; P M Rivers; C J Worringham
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Back pain in the nursing profession. II. The effectiveness of training.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; P W Buckle; M P Hudson; P M Rivers
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Personal characteristics and back injury among hospital nursing personnel.

Authors:  B D Owen; C F Damron
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques.

Authors:  W S Marras; K G Davis; B C Kirking; P K Bertsche
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Occupational low-back pain in nursing staff in a Greek hospital.

Authors:  A Vasiliadou; G G Karvountzis; A Soumilas; D Roumeliotis; E Theodosopoulou
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; P Egger; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.