Literature DB >> 12627750

Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing.

Stefan R Schweinberger1, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

In this viewpoint, we discuss the new evidence on covert face recognition in prosopagnosia presented by Bobes et al. (2003, this issue) and by Sperber and Spinnler (2003, this issue). Contrary to earlier hypotheses, both papers agree that covert and overt face recognition are based on the same mechanism. In line with this suggestion, an analysis of reported cases with prosopagnosia indicates that a degree of successful encoding of facial representations is a prerequisite for covert recognition to occur. While we agree with this general conclusion as far as Bobes et al.'s and Sperber and Spinnler's data are concerned, we also discuss evidence for a dissociation between different measures of covert recognition. Specifically, studies in patients with Capgras delusion and patients with prosopagnosia suggest that skin conductance and behavioural indexes of covert face recognition are mediated by partially different mechanisms. We also discuss implications of the new data for models of normal face recognition that have been successful in simulating covert recognition phenomena (e.g., Young and Burton, 1999, and O'Reilly et al., 1999). Finally, in reviewing recent neurophysiological and brain imaging evidence concerning the neural system for face processing, we argue that the relationship between ERP components (specifically, N170, N250r, and N400) and different cognitive processes in face recognition is beginning to emerge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12627750     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70071-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  36 in total

1.  Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: an integration of central and peripheral measures.

Authors:  Leanne M Williams; Belinda J Liddell; Jennifer Rathjen; Kerri J Brown; Jeffrey Gray; Mary Phillips; Andy Young; Evian Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Event-related potential signatures of relational memory.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Kara D Federmeier; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cortical responses to consciousness of schematic emotional facial expressions: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Claudio Babiloni; Fabrizio Vecchio; Paola Buffo; Maura Buttiglione; Giuseppe Cibelli; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Implicit attitudes in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Kristine M Knutson; Karen A DeTucci; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Sensorimotor simulation and emotion processing: Impairing facial action increases semantic retrieval demands.

Authors:  Joshua D Davis; Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Combined effects of inversion and feature removal on N170 responses elicited by faces and car fronts.

Authors:  Nadine Kloth; Roxane J Itier; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Neural correlates of covert face processing: fMRI evidence from a prosopagnosic patient.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Meiyun Wang; Xiaohong Shi; Lu Feng; Ling Li; Justine Marie Thacker; Jie Tian; Dapeng Shi; Kang Lee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.

Authors:  Romi Zäske; Gregor Volberg; Gyula Kovács; Stefan Robert Schweinberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.