Literature DB >> 23485023

Combined effects of inversion and feature removal on N170 responses elicited by faces and car fronts.

Nadine Kloth1, Roxane J Itier, Stefan R Schweinberger.   

Abstract

The face-sensitive N170 is typically enhanced for inverted compared to upright faces. Itier, Alain, Sedore, and McIntosh (2007) recently suggested that this N170 inversion effect is mainly driven by the eye region which becomes salient when the face configuration is disrupted. Here we tested whether similar effects could be observed with non-face objects that are structurally similar to faces in terms of possessing a homogeneous within-class first-order feature configuration. We presented upright and inverted pictures of intact car fronts, car fronts without lights, and isolated lights, in addition to analogous face conditions. Upright cars elicited substantial N170 responses of similar amplitude to those evoked by upright faces. In strong contrast to face conditions however, the car-elicited N170 was mainly driven by the global shape rather than the presence or absence of lights, and was dramatically reduced for isolated lights. Overall, our data confirm a differential influence of the eye region in upright and inverted faces. Results for car fronts do not suggest similar interactive encoding of eye-like features and configuration for non-face objects, even when these objects possess a similar feature configuration as faces.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485023      PMCID: PMC3926862          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  31 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  B Rossion; J F Delvenne; D Debatisse; V Goffaux; R Bruyer; M Crommelinck; J M Guérit
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain.

Authors:  B Rossion; I Gauthier; M J Tarr; P Despland; R Bruyer; S Linotte; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children.

Authors:  M J Taylor; G E Edmonds; G McCarthy; T Allison
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Laying eyes on headlights: eye movements suggest facial features in cars.

Authors:  Sonja Windhager; Florian Hutzler; Claus-Christian Carbon; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Katrin Schaefer; Truls Thorstensen; Helmut Leder; Karl Grammer
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2010-09

6.  Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Claude Alain; Katherine Sedore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

8.  A neural basis for expert object recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; T Curran
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

9.  Species sensitivity of early face and eye processing.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Patricia Van Roon; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Combined effects of attention and inversion on event-related potentials to human bodies and faces.

Authors:  Tarik N Mohamed; Markus F Neumann; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.065

View more
  10 in total

1.  Early sensitivity for eyes within faces: a new neuronal account of holistic and featural processing.

Authors:  Dan Nemrodov; Thomas Anderson; Frank F Preston; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; David Framorando; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Event-related potentials index neural response to eye contact.

Authors:  Adam J Naples; Jia Wu; Linda C Mayes; James C McPartland
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Do neural correlates of face expertise vary with task demands? Event-related potential correlates of own- and other-race face inversion.

Authors:  Holger Wiese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Phase noise reveals early category-specific modulation of the event-related potentials.

Authors:  Kornél Németh; Petra Kovács; Pál Vakli; Gyula Kovács; Márta Zimmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-24

6.  Putting Up a Big Front: Car Design and Size Affect Road-Crossing Behaviour.

Authors:  Wilhelm K Klatt; Alvin Chesham; Janek S Lobmaier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cosmetic makeup enhances facial attractiveness and affective neural responses.

Authors:  Tomohiro Arai; Hiroshi Nittono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Neural Processing Differences of Facial Emotions Between Human and Vehicles: Evidence From an Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Wenjun Du; Zhongrui Sun; Guanhua Hou; Zhuonan Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-07

9.  Contrast reversal of the iris and sclera increases the face sensitive N170.

Authors:  Kelly J Jantzen; Nicole McNamara; Adam Harris; Anna Schubert; Michael Brooks; Matthew Seifert; Lawrence A Symons
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Dissociating Attention Effects from Categorical Perception with ERP Functional Microstates.

Authors:  Benjamin Dering; David I Donaldson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.