Literature DB >> 12624120

Clinical 18F-FDG oncology patient preparation techniques.

Sharon M Hamblen1, Val J Lowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinical tumor imaging with (18)F-FDG in PET is growing in demand. This article will provide a review of current patient preparation and imaging techniques. The goal is to make the PET study as noninvasive as possible for the patient while obtaining quality images. Communication and coordination when scheduling these studies involves the patient and radiopharmacy, scanner, and support staff. A pertinent patient history (information about weight, pregnancy, breastfeeding, diabetes, etc.) is vital for appropriate patient instructions and patient sequencing. Patient preparation involves many variations on fluid intake, diet, medications, and other factors. Blood glucose levels must be </=150 mg/dL. If the patient has diabetes mellitus or is glucose intolerant, diet-exercise regime and glucose levels should be monitored. Accurate (18)F-FDG dose calculation to be used for region-of-interest analysis or standard uptake value determination is imperative. After (18)F-FDG injection, the patient must remain quiet and still to minimize muscle use. Before the scan, the patient may need relaxation medications, urinary catheterization, or other interventions. At the conclusion of this article, the reader should be able to list pertinent patient history issues that are useful for scheduling an (18)F-FDG tumor scan, discuss methods to ensure accurate (18)F-FDG patient dose calculations, and describe possible methods to help minimize urinary (18)F-FDG excretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12624120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  7 in total

Review 1.  PET imaging in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Barry L Shulkin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-01-27

2.  Respiration artifacts in whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies with combined PET/CT tomographs employing spiral CT technology with 1 to 16 detector rows.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Sandra Rosenbaum; Patrick Veit; Jörg Stattaus; Stefan P Müller; Frank P Difilippo; Heiko Schöder; Osama Mawlawi; Fiona Roberts; Andreas Bockisch; Hilmar Kühl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Variety and complexity of fluorine-18-labelled fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose accumulations in the oral cavity of patients with oral cancers.

Authors:  S Kito; H Koga; M Kodama; M Habu; S Kokuryo; N Yamamoto; M Oda; T Nishino; M Zhang; K Matsuo; N Wakasugi-Sato; S Matsumoto-Takeda; Y Seta; D Yoshiga; T Kaneuji; S Nogami; I Yoshioka; Y Yamashita; T Tanaka; I Miyamoto; C Kitamura; K Tominaga; Y Morimoto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Simultaneous PET-MRI in oncology: a solution looking for a problem?

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Todd E Peterson; Richard G Abramson; David Izquierdo-Garcia; David Garcia-Izquierdo; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Ciprian Catana; H Charles Manning; Zahi A Fayad; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Effects of fasting on serial measurements of hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate metabolism in tumors.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Tiago B Rodrigues; Ferdia A Gallagher; Mikko I Kettunen; Brett W C Kennedy; Sarah L Vowler; Keith A Burling; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  PET/CT in paediatric malignancies - An update.

Authors:  Subramanyam Padma; Palaniswamy Shanmuga Sundaram; Anshu Tewari
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.