Literature DB >> 12618965

Is detection of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancer by a dental health care provider associated with a lower stage at diagnosis?

Jon D Holmes1, Eric J Dierks, Louis D Homer, Bryce E Potter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stage at diagnosis is the most important prognostic indictor for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (SCCs). Unfortunately, approximately 50% of these cancers are identified late (stage III or IV). We set out to examinationine the detection patterns of oral and oropharyngeal SCCs and to determine whether detection of these cancers by various health care providers was associated with a lower stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were gathered on 51 patients with newly diagnosed oral or oropharyngeal SCC through patient interview and chart audit. In addition to demographic data, specific inquiry was made regarding the circumstances surrounding the identification of the lesion. The main outcome measure was tumor stage grouping based on detection source.
RESULTS: Health care providers detecting oral and oropharyngeal SCCs during non-symptom-driven (screening) examinations were dentists, hygienists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and, in 1 case, a denturist. All lesions detected by physicians occurred during a symptom-driven examination. Lesions detected during a non-symptom-driven examination were of a statistically significant lower average clinical and pathologic stage (1.7 and 1.6, respectively) than lesions detected during a symptom-directed examination (2.6 and 2.5, respectively). Additionally, a dental office is the most likely source of detection of a lesion during a screening examination (Fisher exact test, P =.0006). Overall, patients referred from a dental office were of significantly lower stage than those referred from a medical office. Finally, patients who initially saw a regional specialist (dentist, oral and maxillofacial surgeon, or otolaryngologist) with symptoms related to their lesion were more likely to have appropriate treatment initiated than those who initially sought care from their primary care provider.
CONCLUSION: Overall, detection of oral and oropharyngeal SCCs during a non-symptom-driven examination is associated with a lower stage at diagnosis, and this is most likely to occur in a dental office. A regional specialist was more likely than a primary care provider to detect an oral or oropharyngeal SCC and initiate the appropriate treatment during the first visit for symptoms related to the lesion. Copyright 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:285-291, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12618965     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  33 in total

Review 1.  An academic dental center grapples with oral cancer disparities: current collaboration and future opportunities.

Authors:  A Ross Kerr; Jyotsna G Changrani; Francesca M Gany; Gustavo D Cruz
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Smoking and drinking in relation to oral cancer and oral epithelial dysplasia.

Authors:  Douglas E Morse; Walter J Psoter; Deborah Cleveland; Donald Cohen; Mireseyed Mohit-Tabatabai; Diane L Kosis; Ellen Eisenberg
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Evidence of past dental visits and incidence of head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bhawna Gupta; Narinder Kumar; Newell W Johnson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-04

4.  A survey of barriers to screening for oral cancer among rural Black Americans.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; Jennifer L Howell; Henrietta Logan
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Gender-stratified models to examine the relationship between financial hardship and self-reported oral health for older US men and women.

Authors:  Donald L Chi; Reginald Tucker-Seeley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Oropharyngeal cancer as a driver of racial outcome disparities in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 10-year experience at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center.

Authors:  Dan P Zandberg; Sandy Liu; Olga Goloubeva; Robert Ord; Scott E Strome; Mohan Suntharalingam; Rodney Taylor; Robert E Morales; Jeffrey S Wolf; Ann Zimrin; Joshua E Lubek; Lisa M Schumaker; Kevin J Cullen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 7.  [Surgical treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity].

Authors:  Michael Rasse
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

8.  Oral cancer preventive practices of South Carolina dentists and physicians.

Authors:  Susan G Reed; Kathleen B Cartmell; Nadia G Duffy; Amy E Wahlquist; Debajyoti Sinha; Amanda Hollinger; Ashley Bode; Anthony J Alberg; Terry A Day
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Predicting Scheduling and Attending for an Oral Cancer Examination.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; Amber S Emanuel; Jennifer L Howell; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

10.  Self-reported oral cancer screening by smoking status in Maryland: trends over time.

Authors:  Archana Viswanath; Timothy J Kerns; John D Sorkin; Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.