James A Shepperd1,2, Amber S Emanuel3, Jennifer L Howell3, Henrietta L Logan3. 1. Southeast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. shepperd@ufl.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, PO Box 112250, Gainesville, FL, 32611-2250, USA. shepperd@ufl.edu. 3. Southeast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral and pharyngeal cancer is highly treatable if diagnosed early, yet late diagnosis is commonplace apparently because of delays in undergoing an oral cancer examination. PURPOSE: We explored predictors of scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination among a sample of Black and White men who were at high risk for oral cancer because they smoked. METHODS: During an in-person interview, participants (N = 315) from rural Florida learned about oral and pharyngeal cancer, completed survey measures, and were offered a free examination in the next week. Later, participants received a follow-up phone call to explore why they did or did not attend their examination. RESULTS: Consistent with the notion that scheduling and attending an oral cancer exam represent distinct decisions, we found that the two outcomes had different predictors. Defensive avoidance and exam efficacy predicted scheduling an examination; exam efficacy and having coping resources, time, and transportation predicted attending the examination. Open-ended responses revealed that the dominant reasons participants offered for missing a scheduled examination were conflicting obligations, forgetting, and confusion or misunderstanding about the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest interventions to increase scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination.
BACKGROUND:Oral and pharyngeal cancer is highly treatable if diagnosed early, yet late diagnosis is commonplace apparently because of delays in undergoing an oral cancer examination. PURPOSE: We explored predictors of scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination among a sample of Black and White men who were at high risk for oral cancer because they smoked. METHODS: During an in-person interview, participants (N = 315) from rural Florida learned about oral and pharyngeal cancer, completed survey measures, and were offered a free examination in the next week. Later, participants received a follow-up phone call to explore why they did or did not attend their examination. RESULTS: Consistent with the notion that scheduling and attending an oral cancer exam represent distinct decisions, we found that the two outcomes had different predictors. Defensive avoidance and exam efficacy predicted scheduling an examination; exam efficacy and having coping resources, time, and transportation predicted attending the examination. Open-ended responses revealed that the dominant reasons participants offered for missing a scheduled examination were conflicting obligations, forgetting, and confusion or misunderstanding about the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest interventions to increase scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barriers to screening; Coping resources; Defensive avoidance; Examination; Oral and pharyngeal cancer; Screening
Authors: Maria C Katapodi; Noreen C Facione; Christine Miaskowski; Marilyn J Dodd; Catherine Waters Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; John G Marks; Joseph L Riley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 9.308